Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2012
Effectiveness of the Austrian disease management programme "Therapie Aktiv" for type 2 diabetes regarding the improvement of metabolic control, risk profile and guideline adherence: 2 years of follow up.
Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2016Trial
- Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Workforce Changes in Integrated Care.International journal of integrated care · 2018Article
- Exploration of workforce changes in integrated chronic care: Findings from an interactive and emergent research design.PloS one · 2017Review
- Observational
- Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2015Article
- Primary care of patients with high cardiovascular risk : Blood pressure, lipid and diabetic target levels and their achievement in Hungary.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2013Article
- Adherence to international follow-up guidelines in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study in Luxembourg.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the disease management programme (DMP) "Therapie Aktiv" for diabetes mellitus type 2 during the first year of implementation in a cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT), which revealed an improvement of process quality, but only insignificant effects on HbA1c. To further analyse the effects of the DMP we followed up participants of the RCT for another year.
methodsAfter completion of the RCT, the study was continued as an open observational trial. By patient's choice, three groups were formed. Group 1 (DMP/DMP): interventions of the RCT (DMP), who remained in the DMP; group 2 (Control/DMP): controls of the RCT (usual care), who participated in the DMP during the second year; group 3 (Control/Control): controls of the RCT (usual care), who remained as controls. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: HbA1c. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: BMI, lipids, blood pressure and measures of process quality.
resultsOnly 801 of 1,489 RCT participants completed the study (53.8 %). Group 1: n = 355; group 2: n = 335; group 3: n = 111. After 2 years, pre-post-analysis revealed a significant reduction of HbA1c (0.37 %, p < 0.001) in both DMP groups, and a reduction of only 0.03 % (p = 0.975) in the control group. However, the difference between the groups was not significant (p = 0.065). There was a significant improvement of process quality in the DMP groups compared with controls.
conclusionThe DMP clearly enhances process quality. Furthermore, the DMP yields a reduction of HbA1c within groups after 2 years, but significance is lost in between-group analysis. We conclude that the DMP has only a minor effect on metabolic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.