Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22871910›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2012

Sex differences in selecting between food and cocaine reinforcement are mediated by estrogen.

Kerry A Kerstetter, Maya A Ballis, Stevie Duffin-Lutgen, Amanda E Carr, Alexandra M Behrens, Tod E Kippin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerry A KerstetterDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 98101, USA. kerry.kerstetter@seattlechildrens.org
Maya A Ballis
Stevie Duffin-Lutgen
Amanda E Carr
Alexandra M Behrens
Tod E Kippin
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Interactions between prenatal stress and genetics in cocaine responsiveness.R01DA027525 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI KIPPIN, TOD EDWARD · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Chromatin Remodeling in the Prefrontal Cortex in Cocaine AddictionR21DA027115 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI KIPPIN, TOD EDWARD · 2010 to 2011
$411k
NIDA NIH HHS DA027115NIDA NIH HHS DA027525NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027525NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine-dependent women, relative to their male counterparts, report shorter cocaine-free periods and report transiting faster from first use to entering treatment for addiction. Similarly, preclinical studies indicate that female rats, particularly those in the estrus phase of their reproductive cycle, show increased operant responding for cocaine under a wide variety of schedules. Making maladaptive choices is a component of drug dependence, and concurrent reinforcement schedules that examine cocaine choice offers an animal model of the conditions of human drug use; therefore, the examination of sex differences in decision-making may be critical to understanding why women display a more severe profile of cocaine addiction than men. Accordingly, we assessed sex and estrous cycle differences in choice between food (45 mg grain pellets) and intravenous cocaine (0.4 or 1.0 mg/kg per infusion) reinforcement in male, female (freely cycling), and ovariectomized (OVX) females treated with either estrogen benzoate (EB; 5 μg per day) or vehicle. At both cocaine doses, intact female rats choose cocaine over food significantly more than male rats. However, the estrous cycle did not impact the level of cocaine choice in intact females. Nevertheless, OVX females treated with vehicle exhibited a substantially lower cocaine choice compared with those receiving daily EB or to intact females. These results demonstrate that intact females have a greater preference for cocaine over food compared with males. Furthermore, this higher preference is estrogen-dependent, but does not vary across the female reproductive cycle, suggesting that ovarian hormones regulate cocaine choice. The present findings indicate that there is a biological predisposition for females to forgo food reinforcement to obtain cocaine reinforcement, which may substantially contribute to women experiencing a more severe profile of cocaine addiction than men.

Indexed as

FoodReinforcement, PsychologyAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsChoice BehaviorCocaineConditioning, OperantData Interpretation, StatisticalEstrogensEstrous CycleFemaleMaleOvariectomyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySex CharacteristicsCocaineEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID22871910
PMCPMC3473343
OpenAlexW2021055249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.