Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2012
Screening of related donors and peripheral blood stem cell collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres.
Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of improved JACIE standards on the care of related BM and PBSC donors.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Trial
- Cobalt protoporphyrin IX induces transient, dose- and time-dependent granulocyte mobilization with mild metabolic effects in mice.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Article
- Experiences and unmet needs of family members requested to donate haematopoietic stem cells to an ill relative: findings from a prospective multi-centre study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Hematopoietic cell transplant nurse coordinators' perceptions of related donor care: a European survey from the EBMT Nurses Group.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Article
- Donor Selection for Allogenic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical and Ethical Considerations.Stem cells international · 2017Review
- Variations in practice in UK transplant centers: results of a related donor care survey.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Article
- European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Centers with FACT-JACIE Accreditation Have Significantly Better Compliance with Related Donor Care Standards.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016Article
- Significant Improvements in the Practice Patterns of Adult Related Donor Care in US Transplantation Centers.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016Article
- Related hematopoietic cell donor care: is there a role for unrelated donor registries?Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Review
- Deferrals of volunteer stem cell donors referred for evaluation for matched-unrelated stem cell donation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2014Article
- We have a specific duty to maximise the safety of related donors.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012Article
- Thrombophilia screening of related hematopoietic stem cell donors before collection: results of a single-center activity.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecommendations on eligibility criteria for donation of haematopoietic stem cells, management of collection of the cells and follow-up mainly concern unrelated donors. The aim of this study was to analyse the screening of related donors and collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres. MATERIALS AND
methodsA questionnaire regarding eligibility criteria for related haematopoietic stem cell donors, their peripheral blood collections and early follow-up was sent to several apheresis units. Data from the full charts of 500 candidates, screened between May 2005 and December 2009, were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsThe donors' records, eligibility criteria, collections and follow-up are managed differently in each centre. Of the 500 evaluable candidates (51.2% male, 49.8% female; median age 47 years, range 13-77), 26.4% underwent thorough screening according to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standards, while local protocols were applied to 73.6%; 91 candidates (18.2%) proved ineligible for donation. In the end, 352 donors (53.4% male, 46.6% female; median age 45 years, range 16-76) underwent 508 leukaphereses. Central venous catheters were used in 8.0% of donors, mainly in one centre. Unsuitable pre-apheresis peripheral blood parameters were reported in 38.7% of the aphereses. Leukapheresis-related adverse events were recorded in 23.0% of the procedures, with a drop-out rate of 0.2% for severe events. No donation-related fatalities occurred. The CD34+ cell yield was <2×10(6)/kg of recipient's body weight from 1.1% of donors ≥70 years old. DISCUSSION: More uniformity in donor screening procedures, management of peripheral blood collection and follow-up should be planned at a national level to maximise the safety of related donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.