Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22871823›Full record

Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2012

Screening of related donors and peripheral blood stem cell collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres.

Paola Coluccia, Giovanni Crovetti, Claudia Del Fante, Franco Maria Dallavalle, Daniele Laszlò, Piero Ferremi, Daniele Marenchino, Luca Santoleri, Concetto De Filippo, Flavia Mattana and 3 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Experiences and unmet needs of family members requested to donate haematopoietic stem cells to an ill relative: findings from a prospective multi-centre study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Centers with FACT-JACIE Accreditation Have Significantly Better Compliance with Related Donor Care Standards.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Article
  8. Significant Improvements in the Practice Patterns of Adult Related Donor Care in US Transplantation Centers.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. We have a specific duty to maximise the safety of related donors.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Paola ColucciaTransfusion Medicine Service, Apheresis Unit, IRCCS Foundation, National Institute for the Study and Treatment of Cancer, Milan. paola.coluccia@istitutotumori.mi.it
Giovanni Crovetti
Claudia Del Fante
Franco Maria Dallavalle
Daniele Laszlò
Piero Ferremi
Daniele Marenchino
Luca Santoleri
Concetto De Filippo
Flavia Mattana
Luigi Mariani
Paolo Perseghin
Fernando Ravagnani
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITCanadian Apheresis Group · CAEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio · ITOspedale Sant Antonio · ITTumori Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecommendations on eligibility criteria for donation of haematopoietic stem cells, management of collection of the cells and follow-up mainly concern unrelated donors. The aim of this study was to analyse the screening of related donors and collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire regarding eligibility criteria for related haematopoietic stem cell donors, their peripheral blood collections and early follow-up was sent to several apheresis units. Data from the full charts of 500 candidates, screened between May 2005 and December 2009, were retrospectively evaluated.

resultsThe donors' records, eligibility criteria, collections and follow-up are managed differently in each centre. Of the 500 evaluable candidates (51.2% male, 49.8% female; median age 47 years, range 13-77), 26.4% underwent thorough screening according to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standards, while local protocols were applied to 73.6%; 91 candidates (18.2%) proved ineligible for donation. In the end, 352 donors (53.4% male, 46.6% female; median age 45 years, range 16-76) underwent 508 leukaphereses. Central venous catheters were used in 8.0% of donors, mainly in one centre. Unsuitable pre-apheresis peripheral blood parameters were reported in 38.7% of the aphereses. Leukapheresis-related adverse events were recorded in 23.0% of the procedures, with a drop-out rate of 0.2% for severe events. No donation-related fatalities occurred. The CD34+ cell yield was <2×10(6)/kg of recipient's body weight from 1.1% of donors ≥70 years old. DISCUSSION: More uniformity in donor screening procedures, management of peripheral blood collection and follow-up should be planned at a national level to maximise the safety of related donors.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsDonor SelectionLeukapheresisSafetyStem CellsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22871823
PMCPMC3496225
OpenAlexW56280886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.