ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2013
Effects of anaemia on haemodynamic and clinical parameters in apparently stable preterm infants.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A recommendation for the use of electrical biosensing technology in neonatology.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusions, Cerebral Oxygenation, Brain Injury and Development, and Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Hemodynamically significant anemia as an indication of transfusion in preterm infants.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Effects of the feeding protocol during blood transfusion on splanchnic tissue oxygenation and complications in very premature infants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Neonates.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe criteria for erythrocyte transfusion in stable premature infants are currently controversial. Haemodynamic measurements are not common in transfusion practice. The purpose of this study was to determine whether haemodynamic measurements could be helpful as objective criterion for transfusion decisions. We, therefore, evaluated clinical and haemodynamic changes in stable, anaemic, premature infants before and after transfusion using our current blood transfusion protocol based on a haematocrit threshold (<24%) and the neonatologist's discretion. MATERIAL AND
methodsStable premature infants with a haematocrit level ≤30% were prospectively enrolled into the study. Cerebral, intestinal and renal blood flow velocities, cardiac function parameters and vital signs were measured up to three times following every routine haematocrit analysis. Moreover, transfused infants were evaluated three more times: directly before transfusion, and 24 hours and 72 hours after transfusion.
resultsThirty-six infants were enrolled and 23 of them were transfused. Subgroup analysis of transfused infants showed a significant decrease in cerebral blood flow velocities, cardiac output and heart rate. These changes persisted after transfusion. In the entire cohort, the degree of anaemia correlated with the increase of cerebral blood flow velocities, heart rate and cardiac output. DISCUSSION: Cerebral blood velocities in the anterior cerebral artery might represent an objective Doppler sonographic criterion indicating the need for transfusion. The measurement of these velocities is non-invasive and quick and easy to perform. However, a randomised, controlled trial is necessary before a formal recommendation can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.