Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22871650›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Ex vivo culturing of whole, developing Drosophila brains.

Ranjini Prithviraj, Svetlana Trunova, Edward Giniger

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Stem Cell Reactivation in Cultured Drosophila Brain Explants.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling Neurodegenerative Disorders inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cdk5 regulates developmental remodeling of mushroom body neurons in Drosophila.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjini PrithvirajNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Svetlana Trunova
Edward Giniger
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

Roles of Cdk5 in neurodevelopment and neurodegenerationZIANS003106 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GINIGER, EDWARD · 2009 to 2025
$17.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003106NINDS NIH HHS Z01 NS003106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a method for ex vivo culturing of whole Drosophila brains. This can be used as a counterpoint to chronic genetic manipulations for investigating the cell biology and development of central brain structures by allowing acute pharmacological interventions and live imaging of cellular processes. As an example of the technique, prior work from our lab(1) has shown that a previously unrecognized subcellular compartment lies between the axonal and somatodendritic compartments of axons of the Drosophila central brain. The development of this compartment, referred to as the axon initial segment (AIS)(2), was shown genetically to depend on the neuron-specific cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdk5. We show here that ex vivo treatment of wild-type Drosophila larval brains with the Cdk5-specific pharmacological inhibitors roscovitine and olomoucine(3) causes acute changes in actin organization, and in localization of the cell-surface protein Fasciclin 2, that mimic the changes seen in mutants that lack Cdk5 activity genetically. A second example of the ex vivo culture technique is provided for remodeling of the connections of embryonic mushroom body (MB) gamma neurons during metamorphosis from larva to adult. The mushroom body is the center of olfactory learning and memory in the fly(4), and these gamma neurons prune their axonal and dendritic branches during pupal development and then re-extend branches at a later timepoint to establish the adult innervation pattern(5). Pruning of these neurons of the MB has been shown to occur via local degeneration of neurite branches(6), by a mechanism that is triggered by ecdysone, a steroid hormone, acting at the ecdysone receptor B1(7), and that is dependent on the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system(6). Our method of ex vivo culturing can be used to interrogate further the mechanism of developmental remodeling. We found that in the ex vivo culture setting, gamma neurons of the MB recapitulated the process of developmental pruning with a time course similar to that in vivo. It was essential, however, to wait until 1.5 hours after puparium formation before explanting the tissue in order for the cells to commit irreversibly to metamorphosis; dissection of animals at the onset of pupariation led to little or no metamorphosis in culture. Thus, with appropriate modification, the ex vivo culture approach can be applied to study dynamic as well as steady state aspects of central brain biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrosophilaLarvaOrgan Culture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID22871650
PMCPMC3529496
OpenAlexW1981906235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.