Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22870488›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2011

Atypical femur fractures: a review of the evidence and its implication to clinical practice.

Christian M Girgis, Markus J Seibel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A scorecard for osteoporosis in Canada and seven Canadian provinces.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators.Asian spine journal · 2016
    Review
  14. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Review
  15. Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian M Girgis
Markus J Seibel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst bisphosphonates are an established modality in the treatment of osteoporosis, there have been increasing concerns regarding the risk of an unusual form of femur fracture amongst patients receiving bisphosphonates for prolonged periods. These fractures, referred to as 'atypical', have been characterized by a number of clinical and radiographic features that distinguish them from 'typical' osteoporotic fractures. The evidence base is currently split between a large number of case series demonstrating an association between the occurrence of atypical fractures and bisphosphonate use and several population-based studies that do not confirm such an association. Hence, a degree of uncertainty surrounds this important issue. In this review, we examine the emerging evidence on atypical femur fractures, assess hypotheses on their biomechanical evolution and discuss the wider clinical implications of this phenomenon.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsAtypical femur fracturesbisphosphonatesosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID22870488
PMCPMC3383496
OpenAlexW2103609942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.