ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2011
A review of the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Trial
- The effect of denosumab on minimum 3-years BMD changes in patients with osteoporotic hip fractures: a propensity score matching analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Article
- A 70% EthanolMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- MRL/MpJ Mice Resist to Age-Related and Long-Term Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss: Implications for Bone Regeneration and Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Bisphosphonates Prior to Denosumab Treatment on Rebound Fractures: A Mini Review.Journal of bone metabolism · 2022Article
- Risk of infection in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis taking denosumab and bDMARDS.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- The impact of sequential therapy from short-term teriparatide to denosumab compared with denosumab alone in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture: a 1-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- The Osteocyte: New Insights.Annual review of physiology · 2020Review
- Denosumab Regulates Gut Microbiota Composition and Cytokines in Dinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid (DNBS)-Experimental Colitis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Review of the Literature and Practical Guide.Drugs & aging · 2019Review
- Current Treatments and New Developments in the Management of Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis.Drugs · 2019Review
- Denosumab in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.Rheumatology international · 2018Review
- Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients transitioning from bisphosphonates to denosumab treatment for osteoporosis.Odontology · 2018Article
- Denosumab in patients with aneurysmal bone cysts: A case series with preliminary results.Tumori · 2018Article
- Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in the spine pretreated with neoadjuvant denosumab therapy followed by surgical resection in a 5-year-old child: case report and literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018Review
- Osteoporosis: a discussion on the past 5 years.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2017Review
- Can denosumab be a substitute, competitor, or complement to bisphosphonates?The Korean journal of pain · 2017Review
- The Role of the Osteocyte in Bone and Nonbone Disease.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2017Review
- Effects of Denosumab on Bone Metabolic Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Patients Treated with Glucocorticoids.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2017Article
- Current management of aneurysmal bone cysts.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand [RANK-L]) was approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in June 2010, and is highly effective in reducing the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture risk. The registration of denosumab was the culmination of the discovery and clarification of the internal bone microenvironment regulation of bone remodeling: the osteoblast-produced competitors: RANK-L and osteoprotogerin; and the osteoclast receptor: RANK. When RANK-L is upregulated in the estrogen-deficient state and exceeds the amount of osteoprotogerin, there is an increase in osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, and this is the major mechanism for bone mass loss and osteoporotic fractures in the postmenopausal state. The subsequent development of the human monoclonal antibody to RANK-L (denosumab) was the first product developed to reduce bone resorption by inhibiting RANK-L binding to RANK. Denosumab does not accumulate in bone, and has a unique pharmacokinetics so that its biological effect at the registered dose of 60 mg by subcutaneous injection every 6 months is no longer effective, at least as measured by an increase in the bone resorption marker collagen-cross-link C-telopeptide and a decline in bone mineral density as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. This unique pharmacokinetic profile thus suggests that in order to maintain the effectiveness of denosumab, continuous administration might be necessary. Extension of the registration trial ('FREEDOM') 5-year data indicates continued safety and efficacy, and will be extended to 10 years so that even longer-term data will be forthcoming. The profound but reversible suppression of bone turnover that is seen with denosumab partly explains the continuous increase in bone mineral density seen through 8 years of the phase II clinical trials. Denosumab offers a highly effective and safe parenteral therapy for osteoporosis and is being studied long term with the extension of the FREEDOM trial, and in other osteoporotic states - in men and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.