ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2010
Treating reactive arthritis: insights for the clinician.
Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomics: A Viable Approach to Understand the Pathogenesis of Reactive ArthritisEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- A Case Report of Intratesticular Hematoma in a Patient with Reiter's Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ocular involvement in rheumatic diseases.Reumatologia · 2023Review
- Chronic Inflammatory Diseases at Secondary Sites Ensuing Urogenital or PulmonaryMicroorganisms · 2020Review
- Portal Hypertension and an Atypical Reactive Arthritis Like Presentation in a patient infected with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 3.Indian journal of dermatology · 2014Article
- Selected reaction monitoring to differentiate and relatively quantitate isomers of sulfated and unsulfated core 1 O-glycans from salivary MUC7 protein in rheumatoid arthritis.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
THERE ARE TWO MAIN FORMS OF REACTIVE ARTHRITIS (REA): postvenereal and postdysentery. Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is the major causative organism of the postvenereal type; Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia are the major triggers for the postenteric type. All of these causative organisms have been shown to traffic to the synovium in affected individuals. However, one important difference is that the chlamydial organisms have been shown to be viable, whereas, in general, the postenteric organisms are not. Although estimates vary widely, it is felt that 30-50% of all cases of ReA become chronic and the remainder resolve spontaneously within weeks to months. These important differences need to be considered when reviewing the available therapeutic outcomes data. There is a relative paucity of prospective clinical trial data assessing various treatment strategies. A large breadth of clinical experience demonstrates that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids are efficacious, but there have only been two rather small trials assessing NSAIDs and none with corticosteroids. Disease modifying drugs are sometimes utilized in more severe or chronic cases, but only sulfasalazine (SSZ) has been studied. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy has proved remarkably efficacious with other types of spondyloarthritides, but there is very little data to support their use in ReA; theoretical concerns also exist with this drug class in ReA, specifically. Finally, antibiotics have been studied in several trials. A thorough analysis of these trials reveals equivocal results with a possible particular benefit in postchlamydial ReA. These data are reviewed with an emphasis on postchlamydial and postenteric ReA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.