Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22870239›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

The comparative clinical course of pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection.

Gayle P Dolan, Puja R Myles, Stephen J Brett, Joanne E Enstone, Robert C Read, Peter J M Openshaw, Malcolm G Semple, Wei Shen Lim, Bruce L Taylor, James McMenamin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and immunogenicity of 2009 pH1N1 vaccination in HIV-infected pregnant women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Gayle P DolanHealth Protection Research Group, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Gayle.Dolan@hpa.org.uk
Puja R Myles
Stephen J Brett
Joanne E Enstone
Robert C Read
Peter J M Openshaw
Malcolm G Semple
Wei Shen Lim
Bruce L Taylor
James McMenamin
Karl G Nicholson
Barbara Bannister
Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam
Influenza Clinical Information Network (FLU-CIN)
National Health Service · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBHealth Protection Scotland · GBImperial College London · GBNottingham City Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G1000758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Influenza Clinical Information Network (FLU-CIN) was established to gather detailed clinical and epidemiological information about patients with laboratory confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in UK hospitals. This report focuses on the clinical course and outcomes of infection in pregnancy.

methodsA standardised data extraction form was used to obtain detailed clinical information from hospital case notes and electronic records, for patients with PCR-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection admitted to 13 sentinel hospitals in five clinical 'hubs' and a further 62 non-sentinel hospitals, between 11th May 2009 and 31st January 2010.Outcomes were compared for pregnant and non-pregnant women aged 15-44 years, using univariate and multivariable techniques.

resultsOf the 395 women aged 15-44 years, 82 (21%) were pregnant; 73 (89%) in the second or third trimester. Pregnant women were significantly less likely to exhibit severe respiratory distress at initial assessment (OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.82)), require supplemental oxygen on admission (OR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.20-0.80)), or have underlying co-morbidities (p-trend <0.001). However, they were equally likely to be admitted to high dependency (Level 2) or intensive care (Level 3) and/or to die, after adjustment for potential confounders (adj. OR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.46-1.92). Of 11 pregnant women needing Level 2/3 care, 10 required mechanical ventilation and three died.

conclusionsSince the expected prevalence of pregnancy in the source population was 6%, our data suggest that pregnancy greatly increased the likelihood of hospital admission with A(H1N1)pdm09. Pregnant women were less likely than non-pregnant women to have respiratory distress on admission, but severe outcomes were equally likely in both groups.

Indexed as

HospitalizationInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypePandemicsAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceRespiratory Distress SyndromeSeverity of Illness IndexUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID22870239
PMCPMC3411676
OpenAlexW1970845073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.