ArticlePloS one2012
Sight or scent: lemur sensory reliance in detecting food quality varies with feeding ecology.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Bearing Fruit: Miocene Apes and Rosaceous Fruit Evolution.Biological theory · 2023Article
- Anatomy and dietary specialization influence sensory behaviour among sympatric primates.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Non-visual senses in fruit selection by the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata).Primates; journal of primatology · 2022Article
- Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Role of ecology in shaping external nasal morphology in bats and implications for olfactory tracking.PloS one · 2020Article
- Fruit scent and observer colour vision shape food-selection strategies in wild capuchin monkeys.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Food color is in the eye of the beholder: the role of human trichromatic vision in food evaluation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Chemical recognition of fruit ripeness in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Molecular evolutionary characterization of a V1R subfamily unique to strepsirrhine primates.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- The molecular evolutionary dynamics of the vomeronasal receptor (class 1) genes in primates: a gene family on the verge of a functional breakdown.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2014Review
- Colour and odour drive fruit selection and seed dispersal by mouse lemurs.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Influence of visual information on sniffing behavior in a routinely trichromatic primate.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
- Led by the nose: Olfaction in primate feeding ecology.Evolutionary anthropologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual and olfactory cues provide important information to foragers, yet we know little about species differences in sensory reliance during food selection. In a series of experimental foraging studies, we examined the relative reliance on vision versus olfaction in three diurnal, primate species with diverse feeding ecologies, including folivorous Coquerel's sifakas (Propithecus coquereli), frugivorous ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata spp), and generalist ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta). We used animals with known color-vision status and foods for which different maturation stages (and hence quality) produce distinct visual and olfactory cues (the latter determined chemically). We first showed that lemurs preferentially selected high-quality foods over low-quality foods when visual and olfactory cues were simultaneously available for both food types. Next, using a novel apparatus in a series of discrimination trials, we either manipulated food quality (while holding sensory cues constant) or manipulated sensory cues (while holding food quality constant). Among our study subjects that showed relatively strong preferences for high-quality foods, folivores required both sensory cues combined to reliably identify their preferred foods, whereas generalists could identify their preferred foods using either cue alone, and frugivores could identify their preferred foods using olfactory, but not visual, cues alone. Moreover, when only high-quality foods were available, folivores and generalists used visual rather than olfactory cues to select food, whereas frugivores used both cue types equally. Lastly, individuals in all three of the study species predominantly relied on sight when choosing between low-quality foods, but species differed in the strength of their sensory biases. Our results generally emphasize visual over olfactory reliance in foraging lemurs, but we suggest that the relative sensory reliance of animals may vary with their feeding ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.