Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22870228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A novel volume-age-KPS (VAK) glioblastoma classification identifies a prognostic cognate microRNA-gene signature.

Pascal O Zinn, Pratheesh Sathyan, Bhanu Mahajan, John Bruyere, Monika Hegi, Sadhan Majumder, Rivka R Colen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. TCGA-TCIA Impact on Radiogenomics Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022
    Review
  6. Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Semantic imaging features predict disease progression and survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pascal O ZinnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. zinn@bcm.edu
Pratheesh Sathyan
Bhanu Mahajan
John Bruyere
Monika Hegi
Sadhan Majumder
Rivka R Colen

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Image-Guided TherapyR25CA089017 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2001 to 2017
$7.8M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA089017NCI NIH HHS R25 CA089017-06A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have established Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) prognostic and predictive models based on age and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), while very few studies evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of preoperative MR-imaging. However, to date, there is no simple preoperative GBM classification that also correlates with a highly prognostic genomic signature. Thus, we present for the first time a biologically relevant, and clinically applicable tumor Volume, patient Age, and KPS (VAK) GBM classification that can easily and non-invasively be determined upon patient admission.

methodsWe quantitatively analyzed the volumes of 78 GBM patient MRIs present in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) corresponding to patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with VAK annotation. The variables were then combined using a simple 3-point scoring system to form the VAK classification. A validation set (N = 64) from both the TCGA and Rembrandt databases was used to confirm the classification. Transcription factor and genomic correlations were performed using the gene pattern suite and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

resultsVAK-A and VAK-B classes showed significant median survival differences in discovery (P = 0.007) and validation sets (P = 0.008). VAK-A is significantly associated with P53 activation, while VAK-B shows significant P53 inhibition. Furthermore, a molecular gene signature comprised of a total of 25 genes and microRNAs was significantly associated with the classes and predicted survival in an independent validation set (P = 0.001). A favorable MGMT promoter methylation status resulted in a 10.5 months additional survival benefit for VAK-A compared to VAK-B patients.

conclusionsThe non-invasively determined VAK classification with its implication of VAK-specific molecular regulatory networks, can serve as a very robust initial prognostic tool, clinical trial selection criteria, and important step toward the refinement of genomics-based personalized therapy for GBM patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGene Expression RegulationGlioblastomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroRNAsRNA, NeoplasmAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDNA Modification MethylasesDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanMicroRNAsRNA, NeoplasmTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22870228
PMCPMC3411674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.