ArticlePloS one2012
A novel volume-age-KPS (VAK) glioblastoma classification identifies a prognostic cognate microRNA-gene signature.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Glioblastoma invasion patterns from a clinical perspective-a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- TCGA-TCIA Impact on Radiogenomics Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Time-to-event overall survival prediction in glioblastoma multiforme patients using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Peritumoral ADC Values Correlate with the MGMT Methylation Status in Patients with Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Review
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in neuro-oncology imaging.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
- Combining molecular and imaging metrics in cancer: radiogenomics.Insights into imaging · 2020Review
- The MRI Features and Prognosis of Gliomas Associated With IDH1 Mutation: A Single Center Study in Southwest China.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Multicenter study demonstrates radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance perfusion images identify pseudoprogression in glioblastoma.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Review
- Article
- Combining multimodal imaging and treatment features improves machine learning-based prognostic assessment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Radiogenomics correlation between MR imaging features and major genetic profiles in glioblastoma.European radiology · 2018Article
- Multi-center study finds postoperative residual non-enhancing component of glioblastoma as a new determinant of patient outcome.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Semantic imaging features predict disease progression and survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018Article
- Non-invasive tumor genotyping using radiogenomic biomarkers, a systematic review and oncology-wide pathway analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- BCAT1 is a New MR Imaging-related Biomarker for Prognosis Prediction in IDH1-wildtype Glioblastoma Patients.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- New prognostic factor telomerase reverse transcriptase promotor mutation presents without MR imaging biomarkers in primary glioblastoma.Neuroradiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have established Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) prognostic and predictive models based on age and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), while very few studies evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of preoperative MR-imaging. However, to date, there is no simple preoperative GBM classification that also correlates with a highly prognostic genomic signature. Thus, we present for the first time a biologically relevant, and clinically applicable tumor Volume, patient Age, and KPS (VAK) GBM classification that can easily and non-invasively be determined upon patient admission.
methodsWe quantitatively analyzed the volumes of 78 GBM patient MRIs present in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) corresponding to patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with VAK annotation. The variables were then combined using a simple 3-point scoring system to form the VAK classification. A validation set (N = 64) from both the TCGA and Rembrandt databases was used to confirm the classification. Transcription factor and genomic correlations were performed using the gene pattern suite and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.
resultsVAK-A and VAK-B classes showed significant median survival differences in discovery (P = 0.007) and validation sets (P = 0.008). VAK-A is significantly associated with P53 activation, while VAK-B shows significant P53 inhibition. Furthermore, a molecular gene signature comprised of a total of 25 genes and microRNAs was significantly associated with the classes and predicted survival in an independent validation set (P = 0.001). A favorable MGMT promoter methylation status resulted in a 10.5 months additional survival benefit for VAK-A compared to VAK-B patients.
conclusionsThe non-invasively determined VAK classification with its implication of VAK-specific molecular regulatory networks, can serve as a very robust initial prognostic tool, clinical trial selection criteria, and important step toward the refinement of genomics-based personalized therapy for GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.