Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22870216›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Expression changes in the stroma of prostate cancer predict subsequent relapse.

Zhenyu Jia, Farah B Rahmatpanah, Xin Chen, Waldemar Lernhardt, Yipeng Wang, Xiao-Qin Xia, Anne Sawyers, Manuel Sutton, Michael McClelland, Dan Mercola

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prostate Cancer Secretome and Membrane Proteome fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders and Brain and Body Donation Program.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhenyu JiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America. zjia@uci.edu
Farah B Rahmatpanah
Xin Chen
Waldemar Lernhardt
Yipeng Wang
Xiao-Qin Xia
Anne Sawyers
Manuel Sutton
Michael McClelland
Dan Mercola

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
CARCINOGENESIST32CA009054 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EDINGER, AIMEE L, FRUMAN, DAVID ALEXANDER · 1985 to 2025
$8.6M
Evaluation of Predictive Signatures of Prostate CancerU01CA114810 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MERCOLA, DAN · 2005 to 2009
$8.2M
The Prostate Cancer Tumor Microenvironment Exhibits Differentially Expressed GeneU01CA152738 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEE, CHUNG, MERCOLA, DAN · 2010 to 2015
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009054NCI NIH HHS T32CA009054NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114810NCI NIH HHS U01 CA1148102NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers are needed to address overtreatment that occurs for the majority of prostate cancer patients that would not die of the disease but receive radical treatment. A possible barrier to biomarker discovery may be the polyclonal/multifocal nature of prostate tumors as well as cell-type heterogeneity between patient samples. Tumor-adjacent stroma (tumor microenvironment) is less affected by genetic alteration and might therefore yield more consistent biomarkers in response to tumor aggressiveness. To this end we compared Affymetrix gene expression profiles in stroma near tumor and identified a set of 115 probe sets for which the expression levels were significantly correlated with time-to-relapse. We also compared patients that chemically relapsed shortly after prostatectomy (<1 year), and patients that did not relapse in the first four years after prostatectomy. We identified 131 differentially expressed microarray probe sets between these two categories. 19 probe sets (15 genes overlapped between the two gene lists with p<0.0001). We developed a PAM-based classifier by training on samples containing stroma near tumor: 9 rapid relapse patient samples and 9 indolent patient samples. We then tested the classifier on 47 different samples, containing 90% or more stroma. The classifier predicted the risk status of patients with an average accuracy of 87%. This is the first general tumor microenvironment-based prognostic classifier. These results indicate that the prostate cancer microenvironment exhibits reproducible changes useful for predicting outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22870216
PMCPMC3411675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.