ArticleKorean circulation journal2012
Acute coronary stent thrombosis in cancer patients: a case series report.
Article in Korean circulation journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful management of the recurrent acute in-stent thrombosis despite optimal medical therapy: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Review
- Recurrent, isolated left main coronary artery stenosis in a young female.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Identification of Biomarkers Associated With CD8+ T Cells in Coronary Artery Disease and Their Pan-Cancer Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Cancer-Associated Atherothrombosis: The Challenge.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2021Review
- Drug-Eluting Stents: Their Preventative/Prophylactic Role Against Gemcitabine Induced Acute Coronary Syndrome.Cureus · 2021Review
- Cancer and Coronary Artery Disease: Common Associations, Diagnosis and Management Challenges.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Management of CAD in Patients with Active Cancer: the Interventional Cardiologists' Perspective.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Is there still a place for thrombectomy?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2016Article
- Relationship Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been a growing numbers of patients diagnosed with malignancy and coronary artery disease simultaneously or serially. In the era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stent thrombosis has been a rare but challenging problem. Recently, we experienced two unique cases of acute stent thrombosis in patients with malignancy. The first case showed acute and subacute stent thrombosis after PCI. The second case revealed simultaneous thromboses in stent and non-treated native coronary artery. We believe that we need rigorous precautions in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and malignancy, especially with regards to deciding how and whether to revascularize, as well as which anti-platelet agents to select.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.