Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22869750›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement.

Aaron Schurger, Jacobo D Sitt, Stanislas Dehaene

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 509 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Rhythmic oscillations of visual contrast sensitivity synchronized with action.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  4. Modulating conscious movement intention by noninvasive brain stimulation and the underlying neural mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  5. Better get back to work: a role for motor beta desynchronization in incentive motivation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Neural Signature of the Bias Toward Self-Focus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron SchurgerCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), and Direction des Sciences du Vivant, I2BM, NeuroSpin Center, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Gif sur Yvette 91191, France. aaron.schurger@gmail.com
Jacobo D Sitt
Stanislas Dehaene
Inserm · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gradual buildup of neuronal activity known as the "readiness potential" reliably precedes voluntary self-initiated movements, in the average time locked to movement onset. This buildup is presumed to reflect the final stages of planning and preparation for movement. Here we present a different interpretation of the premovement buildup. We used a leaky stochastic accumulator to model the neural decision of "when" to move in a task where there is no specific temporal cue, but only a general imperative to produce a movement after an unspecified delay on the order of several seconds. According to our model, when the imperative to produce a movement is weak, the precise moment at which the decision threshold is crossed leading to movement is largely determined by spontaneous subthreshold fluctuations in neuronal activity. Time locking to movement onset ensures that these fluctuations appear in the average as a gradual exponential-looking increase in neuronal activity. Our model accounts for the behavioral and electroencephalography data recorded from human subjects performing the task and also makes a specific prediction that we confirmed in a second electroencephalography experiment: Fast responses to temporally unpredictable interruptions should be preceded by a slow negative-going voltage deflection beginning well before the interruption itself, even when the subject was not preparing to move at that particular moment.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementNeuronsPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceStochastic ProcessesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22869750
PMCPMC3479453
OpenAlexW2012598170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.