Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22869594›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2012

The evolving concept of cancer and metastasis stem cells.

Irène Baccelli, Andreas Trumpp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The prognostic value of CD133 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Do Metastatic Cells Arise from PD-L1International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irène BaccelliHeidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas Trumpp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept, which arose more than a decade ago, proposed that tumor growth is sustained by a subpopulation of highly malignant cancerous cells. These cells, termed CSCs, comprise the top of the tumor cell hierarchy and have been isolated from many leukemias and solid tumors. Recent work has discovered that this hierarchy is embedded within a genetically heterogeneous tumor, in which various related but distinct subclones compete within the tumor mass. Thus, genetically distinct CSCs exist on top of each subclone, revealing a highly complex cellular composition of tumors. The CSC concept has therefore evolved to better model the complex and highly dynamic processes of tumorigenesis, tumor relapse, and metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsRecurrenceSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22869594
PMCPMC3413352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.