Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22869589›Full record

ReviewMolecular pharmacology2013

Small molecule modulation of nuclear receptor conformational dynamics: implications for function and drug discovery.

Douglas J Kojetin, Thomas P Burris

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Illuminating ligand-induced dynamics in nuclear receptors through MD simulations.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Peptide Helix-YPPAR research · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas J KojetinDepartment of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute, 130 Scripps Way, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA. dkojetin@scripps.edu
Thomas P Burris
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Development of ROR ligands for treatment of circadian rhythm disordersR01MH092769 · NIMH · ST. LOUIS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY · PI BURRIS, THOMAS P, WALKER, JOHN K. · 2011 to 2020
$6.1M
REV-ERB ligands for treatment of anxiety disordersR01MH093429 · NIMH · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI BURRIS, THOMAS P · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Regulation of REV-ERBalpha and REV-ERBbeta function of HEMER01DK080201 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURRIS, THOMAS P · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080201NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK080201NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092769NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH092769NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093429NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH093429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear receptors are targets for a wide range of ligands, both natural and synthetic, that regulate their activity and provide a means to pharmacologically modulate the receptor. Recent emphasis in the nuclear receptor field has focused on selective nuclear receptor modulators, which can display graded transcriptional responses and tissue selective pharmacological responses that deviate from the prototypical agonist or antagonist. Understanding the molecular mechanism of action of these selective modulators will provide significant insight toward the development of the next generation of modulators. Although most nuclear receptor structural studies have primarily focused on obtaining ligand-receptor cocrystal structures, recent studies implicate an important role for protein dynamics in the mechanism of action of nuclear receptor ligands. Here we review nuclear receptor studies reporting how ligands modulate the conformational dynamics of the nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD). A particular emphasis is placed on protein NMR and hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) techniques and how they provide complementary information that, when combined with crystallography, provide detailed insight into the function of nuclear receptors.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayHumansLigandsModels, MolecularPharmaceutical PreparationsProtein ConformationReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearStructure-Activity RelationshipLigandsPharmaceutical PreparationsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID22869589
PMCPMC3533479
OpenAlexW2098516495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.