Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22868835›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2012

Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anne W S Rutjes, Peter Jüni, Bruno R da Costa, Sven Trelle, Eveline Nüesch, Stephan Reichenbach

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04061733 (New Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Hydrogel for the Treatment of the Pain of Knee Arthrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 268 papers, 34 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 34 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04061733 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

New Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Hydrogel for the Treatment of the Pain of Knee Arthrosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorPromedonRan2019 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, PainArmsHydrogel injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 34 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections for hip osteoarthritis: a level I systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Intra-articular injections of ozone versus hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: a level I meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Guideline
  17. Pooled it
  18. Guideline
  19. Guideline
  20. Pooled it

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne W S RutjesInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Clinical Trials Unit Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter Jüni
Bruno R da Costa
Sven Trelle
Eveline Nüesch
Stephan Reichenbach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViscosupplementation, the intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid, is widely used for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. PURPOSE: To assess the benefits and risks of viscosupplementation for adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966 to January 2012), EMBASE (1980 to January 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1970 to January 2012), and other sources. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials in any language that compared viscosupplementation with sham or nonintervention control in adults with knee osteoarthritis. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes were pain intensity and flare-ups. Secondary outcomes included function and serious adverse events. Reviewers used duplicate abstractions, assessed study quality, pooled data by using a random-effects model, examined funnel plots, and explored heterogeneity by using meta-regression. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighty-nine trials involving 12 667 adults met inclusion criteria. Sixty-eight had a sham control, 40 had a follow-up duration greater than 3 months, and 22 used cross-linked forms of hyaluronic acid. Overall, 71 trials (9617 patients) showed that viscosupplementation moderately reduced pain (effect size, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.46 to -0.28]). There was important between-trial heterogeneity and an asymmetrical funnel plot: Trial size, blinded outcome assessment, and publication status were associated with effect size. Five unpublished trials (1149 patients) showed an effect size of -0.03 (CI, -0.14 to 0.09). Eighteen large trials with blinded outcome assessment (5094 patients) showed a clinically irrelevant effect size of -0.11 (CI, -0.18 to -0.04). Six trials (811 patients) showed that viscosupplementation increased, although not statistically significantly, the risk for flare-ups (relative risk, 1.51 [CI, 0.84 to 2.72]). Fourteen trials (3667 patients) showed that viscosupplementation increased the risk for serious adverse events (relative risk, 1.41 [CI, 1.02 to 1.97]). LIMITATIONS: Trial quality was generally low. Safety data were often not reported.

conclusionIn patients with knee osteoarthritis, viscosupplementation is associated with a small and clinically irrelevant benefit and an increased risk for serious adverse events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Arco Foundation.

Indexed as

HumansHyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneePainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicViscosupplementationViscosupplementsHyaluronic AcidViscosupplements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.