Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22867682›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Patient centredness and the outcome of primary care consultations with patients with depression in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation.

Bhautesh Jani, Annemieke P Bikker, Maria Higgins, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Paul Little, Graham C M Watt, Stewart W Mercer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor-patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhautesh JaniGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Annemieke P Bikker
Maria Higgins
Bridie Fitzpatrick
Paul Little
Graham C M Watt
Stewart W Mercer

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with depression are managed in general practice. In deprived areas, depression is more common and poorer outcomes have been reported.

aimTo compare general practice consultations and early outcomes for patients with depression living in areas of high or low socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN AND

settingSecondary data analysis of a prospective observational study involving 25 GPs and 356 consultations in deprived areas, and 20 GPs and 303 consultations in more affluent areas, with follow-up at 1 month.

methodValidated measures were used to (a) objectively assess the patient centredness of consultations, and (b) record patient perceptions of GP empathy.

resultsPHQ-9 scores >10 (suggestive of caseness for moderate to severe depression) were significantly more common in deprived than in affluent areas (30.1% versus 18.5%, P<0.001). Patients with depression in deprived areas had more multimorbidity (65.4% versus 48.2%, P<0.05). Perceived GP empathy and observer-rated patient-centred communication were significantly lower in consultations in deprived areas. Outcomes at 1 month were significantly worse (persistent caseness 71.4% deprived, 43.2% affluent, P = 0.01). After multilevel multiregression modelling, observer-rated patient centredness in the consultation was predictive of improvement in PHQ-9 score in both affluent and deprived areas.

conclusionIn deprived areas, patients with depression are more common and early outcomes are poorer compared with affluent areas. Patient-centred consulting appears to improve early outcome but may be difficult to achieve in deprived areas because of the inverse care law and the burden of multimorbidity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCommunicationDepressive DisorderFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPrevalenceProspective StudiesScotlandSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID22867682
PMCPMC3404336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.