Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22867037›Full record

Trial reportExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2012

Alternative substance paradigm: effectiveness of beverage blinding and effects on acute alcohol responses.

Megan Conrad, Patrick McNamara, Andrea King

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Relationships between generalized impulsivity and subjective stimulant and sedative responses following alcohol administration.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Validation of the brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (B-BAES).Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2013
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Haven't lost the positive feeling: a dose-response, oral alcohol challenge study in drinkers with alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Review
  19. Striatal activity correlates with stimulant-like effects of alcohol in healthy volunteers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan ConradDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison Street, MC 285, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. mconrad@uic.edu
Patrick McNamara
Andrea King
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THOMAS F GAJEWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
ZOLEDRONATE &OSTEOPOROTIC EFFECTS OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATIM01RR000055 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GARFINKEL, MARC R · 1985 to 2007
$19.0M
Alcohol Stimulation and Sedation in Binge Drinkers - Renewal 01R01AA013746 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DANIEL J FRIDBERG, ANDREA C KING · 2003 to 2026
$11.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599NCI NIH HHS P30-CA14599NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000055NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00055NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013746NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA013746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental goal of double-blind alcohol challenge studies is to reduce alcohol expectancies, though there is little research on the effectiveness of blinding procedures and their relationship to acute alcohol responses. This study examined social drinkers' perception of beverage content and related alcohol response during 3 separate double-blind experimental sessions with placebo, low-dose alcohol (0.4 g/kg), and high-dose alcohol (0.8 g/kg). Using the alternative substance paradigm, participants (N = 182) were informed that the beverage they consumed might contain alcohol, a stimulant, a sedative, or a placebo. At several time points, subjective and objective measures were obtained, and participants were asked to identify which substance they received. During both placebo and low-dose alcohol sessions, 33% and 50% of participants, respectively, did not correctly identify the beverage content; during the high-dose alcohol session, 20% did not correctly identify the beverage. Although correct and incorrect identifiers at any dose level did not differ on major background variables, drinking characteristics, or psychomotor performance during these sessions, they did differ on self-reported subjective responses, with greater sedation reported by incorrect identifiers in the placebo and high-dose conditions. In summary, results suggest that the alternative substance paradigm may be a viable option for alcohol laboratory studies, particularly for repeated sessions in within-subject designs and in cases in which the experimenter wants to reduce expectancy by not revealing a priori that alcohol is being administered.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdultAlcohol DrinkingDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEthanolFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID22867037
PMCPMC4048031
OpenAlexW2068905960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.