Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22865733›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.).

R Rincent, D Laloë, S Nicolas, T Altmann, D Brunel, P Revilla, V M Rodríguez, J Moreno-Gonzalez, A Melchinger, E Bauer and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling the interactions between design optimization, modeling strategies, and spatial analysis in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of scale parameter for marker variance prior in some Bayesian whole-genome regression methods.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeted expansion of a barley genebank core collection facilitates the discovery of disease resistance loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

R RincentUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) de Génétique Végétale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université Paris-Sud, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
D Laloë
S Nicolas
T Altmann
D Brunel
P Revilla
V M Rodríguez
J Moreno-Gonzalez
A Melchinger
E Bauer
C-C Schoen
N Meyer
C Giauffret
C Bauland
P Jamin
J Laborde
H Monod
P Flament
A Charcosset
L Moreau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection refers to the use of genotypic information for predicting breeding values of selection candidates. A prediction formula is calibrated with the genotypes and phenotypes of reference individuals constituting the calibration set. The size and the composition of this set are essential parameters affecting the prediction reliabilities. The objective of this study was to maximize reliabilities by optimizing the calibration set. Different criteria based on the diversity or on the prediction error variance (PEV) derived from the realized additive relationship matrix-best linear unbiased predictions model (RA-BLUP) were used to select the reference individuals. For the latter, we considered the mean of the PEV of the contrasts between each selection candidate and the mean of the population (PEVmean) and the mean of the expected reliabilities of the same contrasts (CDmean). These criteria were tested with phenotypic data collected on two diversity panels of maize (Zea mays L.) genotyped with a 50k SNPs array. In the two panels, samples chosen based on CDmean gave higher reliabilities than random samples for various calibration set sizes. CDmean also appeared superior to PEVmean, which can be explained by the fact that it takes into account the reduction of variance due to the relatedness between individuals. Selected samples were close to optimality for a wide range of trait heritabilities, which suggests that the strategy presented here can efficiently sample subsets in panels of inbred lines. A script to optimize reference samples based on CDmean is available on request.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenome, PlantModels, StatisticalPhenotypeAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationInbreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReference StandardsSelection, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

PMID22865733
PMCPMC3454892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.