Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22865029›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Membrane-damaging potential of natural L-(-)-usnic acid in Staphylococcus aureus.

V K Gupta, S Verma, S Gupta, A Singh, A Pal, S K Srivastava, P K Srivastava, S C Singh, M P Darokar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unassuming Lichens: Nature's Hidden Antimicrobial Warriors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. GC-MS Profiling and Pharmacological Potential ofTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. New FeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of the Dibenzofuran, Usnic Acid, on Inhibition of Ocular Biofilm Formation Due to Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The GenusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Synergistic Effect between Usnic Acid and Polymyxin B against Resistant Clinical Isolates ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V K GuptaCSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP, Lucknow, 226 015, India.
S Verma
S Gupta
A Singh
A Pal
S K Srivastava
P K Srivastava
S C Singh
M P Darokar
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants · INBanaras Hindu University · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to try to understand the antibacterial mechanism of L-(-)-usnic acid isolated for the first time from fruticose lichen Usnea subfloridana using clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of L-(-)-usnic acid against the clinical isolates of MRSA and reference strain S. aureus MTCC-96 (SA-96) was in the range 25-50 μg/ml. Treatment of both reference and clinical strains (MRSA-ST 2071) with four-fold MIC concentrations (100-200 μg/ml) of L-(-)-usnic acid reduced the viability of cells without damaging the cell wall. However, the loss of 260 nm absorbing material and increase in propidium iodide uptake was observed in both of the strains. Similarly, a combined effect of L-(-)-usnic acid (25-50 μg/ml) and 7.5 % NaCl resulted in a reduced number of viable cells within 24 h in comparison to the control. These observations clearly indicate that L-(-)-usnic acid exerts its action by disruption of the bacterial membrane. Further, in vivo efficacy showed that L-(-)-usnic acid significantly (p < 0.001) lowered the microbial load of spleen at doses ranging from 1 to 5 mg/kg. Further, toxicity studies in infected mice at doses 20 times higher than the efficacious dose indicated L-(-)usnic acid to be safe. Paradoxically, L-(-)usnic acid exhibited changes in serum triglycerides, alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and liver organ weight in the healthy mice administered with only 25 mg/kg body weight. The results obtained in this study showed that natural L-(-)-usnic acid exerts its antibacterial activity against MRSA by disruption of the cell membrane. Further, the natural L-(-)-usnic acid was found to be safe up to 100 mg/kg body weight, thereby, making it a probable candidate for treating S. aureus infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzofuransCell MembraneColony Count, MicrobialDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilitySpleenStaphylococcal InfectionsUsneaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzofuransusnic acid

Identifiers

PMID22865029
OpenAlexW2087775241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.