ReviewAIDS and behavior2013
MACH14: a multi-site collaboration on ART adherence among 14 institutions.
Review in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost of behavioral interventions utilizing electronic drug monitoring for antiretroviral therapy adherence.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013Trial
- Super Learner Analysis of Electronic Adherence Data Improves Viral Prediction and May Provide Strategies for Selective HIV RNA Monitoring.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2015Article
- Assessing usual care in clinical trials.Western journal of nursing research · 2015Article
- The validity of self-reported medication adherence as an outcome in clinical trials of adherence-promotion interventions: Findings from the MACH14 study.AIDS and behavior · 2014Article
- Validity of behavioral measures as proxies for HIV-related outcomes.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2014Article
- The association between poor antiretroviral adherence and unsafe sex: differences by gender and sexual orientation and implications for scale-up of treatment as prevention.AIDS and behavior · 2014Article
- Heterogeneity among studies in rates of decline of antiretroviral therapy adherence over time: results from the multisite adherence collaboration on HIV 14 study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013Article
- Association between use of specific drugs and antiretroviral adherence: findings from MACH 14.AIDS and behavior · 2013Article
- ART adherence changes among patients in community substance use treatment: a preliminary analysis from MACH14.AIDS research and therapy · 2012Article
- Racial/Ethnic disparities in ART adherence in the United States: findings from the MACH14 study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2012Article
- A closer look at depression and its relationship to HIV antiretroviral adherence.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of original data from multiple antiretroviral (ARV) adherence studies offers a promising, but little used method to generate evidence to advance the field. This paper provides an overview of the design and implementation of MACH14, a collaborative, multi-site study in which a large data system has been created for integrated analyses by pooling original data from 16 longitudinal ARV adherence studies. Studies selected met specific criteria including similar research design and data domains such as adherence measured with medication event monitoring system, psychosocial factors related to adherence behavior, and virologic and clinical outcomes. The data system created contains individual data (collected between 1997 and 2009) from 2,860 HIV patients. Collaboration helped resolve the challenges inherent in pooling data across multiple studies, yet produced a data system with strong statistical power and potentially greater capacity to address key scientific questions than possible with single-sample studies or even meta-analytic designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.