Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864885›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2012

Real-time computed tomography-based augmented reality for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery navigation.

D E Azagury, M Ryou, S N Shaikh, R San José Estépar, B I Lengyel, J Jagadeesan, K G Vosburgh, C C Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D E AzaguryMinimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
M Ryou
S N Shaikh
R San José Estépar
B I Lengyel
J Jagadeesan
K G Vosburgh
C C Thompson
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
IMAGE GUIDED THERAPY CENTERP41RR019703 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI JOLESZ, FERENC A · 2010 to 2011
$8.6M
Multidisciplinary Training in Image-Guided TherapyR25CA089017 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2001 to 2017
$7.8M
CT-based Phenotype for Airway Remodeling in COPD based on Airway Wall Density PowK25HL104085 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL · 2010 to 2014
$765k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA089017NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR019703NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL104085NHLBI NIH HHS K25HL104085NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is technically challenging owing to endoscopic short-sighted visualization, excessive scope flexibility and lack of adequate instrumentation. Augmented reality may overcome these difficulties. This study tested whether an image registration system for NOTES procedures (IR-NOTES) can facilitate navigation.

methodsIn three human cadavers 15 intra-abdominal organs were targeted endoscopically with and without IR-NOTES via both transgastric and transcolonic routes, by three endoscopists with different levels of expertise. Ease of navigation was evaluated objectively by kinematic analysis, and navigation complexity was determined by creating an organ access complexity score based on the same data.

resultsWithout IR-NOTES, 21 (11·7 per cent) of 180 targets were not reached (expert endoscopist 3, advanced 7, intermediate 11), compared with one (1 per cent) of 90 with IR-NOTES (intermediate endoscopist) (P = 0·002). Endoscope movements were significantly less complex in eight of the 15 listed organs when using IR-NOTES. The most complex areas to access were the pelvis and left upper quadrant, independently of the access route. The most difficult organs to access were the spleen (5 failed attempts; 3 of 7 kinematic variables significantly improved) and rectum (4 failed attempts; 5 of 7 kinematic variables significantly improved). The time needed to access the rectum through a transgastric approach was 206·3 s without and 54·9 s with IR-NOTES (P = 0·027).

conclusionThe IR-NOTES system enhanced both navigation efficacy and ease of intra-abdominal NOTES exploration for operators of all levels. The system rendered some organs accessible to non-expert operators, thereby reducing one impediment to NOTES procedures.

Indexed as

Computer SystemsAbdominal WallAdultCadaverComputer SimulationDigestive SystemFemaleHumansMaleNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPelvic FloorTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID22864885
PMCPMC3677565
OpenAlexW2108888232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.