Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864806›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2012

Familial colon cancer syndromes: an update of a rapidly evolving field.

Swati G Patel, Dennis J Ahnen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diagnosed with a common cancer at an unusual age: causal attributions of survivors of adolescent and young adult colorectal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swati G PatelUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Swati.Patel@ucdenver.edu
Dennis J Ahnen

Funding

Promoting Colon Cancer Screening in High-Risk FamiliesR01CA068099 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AHNEN, DENNIS J · 1995 to 2008
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA068099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Up to 30 % of CRCs have evidence of a familial component, and about 5 % are thought to be due to well-characterized inherited mutations. This review will focus on recent developments in the understanding of the individual hereditary CRC syndromes, including Lynch syndrome, familial CRC type X, familial adenomatous polyposis, MutYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, PTEN hamartomatous syndrome, and serrated polyposis syndrome. Advances within the area of hereditary colon cancer syndromes paint a picture of a rapidly moving, rapidly maturing, and increasingly collaborative field with many opportunities for ongoing research and development.

Indexed as

Cell Adhesion MoleculesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA GlycosylasesEarly Detection of CancerGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHamartoma Syndrome, MultipleHumansNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA GlycosylasesmutY adenine glycosylase

Identifiers

PMID22864806
PMCPMC3448005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.