Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2013
A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with vaginal reconstructive procedures and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Update of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecological Pathology: Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2017Pooled it
- Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2016Pooled it
- Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.Current urology reports · 2015Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgeryPooled it
- Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.International urogynecology journal · 2019Trial
- Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial.International urogynecology journal · 2017Trial
- High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.International urogynecology journal · 2015Trial
- Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.Journal of minimally invasive gynecologyTrial
- Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy with 1-Day Hospitalization: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Large language models in systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatments for vaginal vault prolapse.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Transvaginal Mesh Surgery Is Sufficient to Repair Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared to Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Association of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Route at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy with Postoperative Complications.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal prolapse among the global population.BJUI compass · 2025Review
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis prospective multi-centre true two-sided equivalence trial was designed to test the clinical equivalence of open (ASCP) and laparoscopic (LSCP) sacrocolpopexy using objective and subjective outcomes
methodsThe study was carried out in three urogynaecology units in England, UK and the patient population consisted of women referred with symptomatic and bothersome post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse at least 1 cm above or beyond the hymeneal remnants. The interventions were either abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy following randomisation to one of the types of surgery.
resultsFor the primary outcome (point C on the POP-Q) the results at 1 year were -6.63 cm for the open ASCP and -6.67 cm for the LSCP respectively. Subjective outcomes at 1 year showed that 90% of the ASCP group and 80% of the LSCP group were "much better". There were improvements with regard to blood loss, haemoglobin and shorter length of stay in the LSCP group compared with the ASCP group.
conclusionThis fully powered randomised controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has shown clinical equivalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.