Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864665›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2013

Preclinical evaluation of a novel c-Met inhibitor in a gastric cancer xenograft model using small animal PET.

Stefan Wiehr, Oliver von Ahsen, Lars Röse, Andre Mueller, Julia G Mannheim, Valerie Honndorf, Damaris Kukuk, Gerald Reischl, Bernd J Pichler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PET of c-Met in Cancer with ⁶⁴Cu-Labeled Hepatocyte Growth Factor.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. New strategy for monitoring targeted therapy: molecular imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan WiehrDepartment of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Laboratory for Preclinical Imaging and Imaging Technology of the Werner Siemens-Foundation, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. stefan.wiehr@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Oliver von Ahsen
Lars Röse
Andre Mueller
Julia G Mannheim
Valerie Honndorf
Damaris Kukuk
Gerald Reischl
Bernd J Pichler
Bayer (Germany) · DESiemens (Germany) · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHere, we describe the efficacy of the novel small molecule c-Met inhibitor BAY 853474 in reducing tumor growth in the Hs746T gastric cancer xenograft model and tested the suitability of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) versus 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) for response monitoring in a gastric cancer xenograft mouse model using small animal PET. PROCEDURES: The c-Met inhibitor or vehicle control was administered orally at various doses in tumor-bearing mice. Glucose uptake and proliferation was measured using PET before, 48 and 96 h after the first treatment. The PET data were compared to data from tumor growth curves, autoradiography, Glut-1 and Ki-67 staining of tumor sections, and biochemical analysis of tissue probes, i.e., c-Met and ERK phosphorylation and cyclin D1 levels.

resultsBAY 853474 significantly reduces tumor growth. [(18)F]FDG uptake in Hs746T tumors was significantly reduced in the groups receiving the drug, compared with the control group. The [(18)F]FLT uptake in the tumor tissue was completely absent 96 h after treatment. Autoradiographic, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses confirmed the PET findings. Treatment with the c-Met inhibitor did not affect body weight or glucose levels, and no adverse effects were observed in the animals.

conclusionThese preclinical findings suggest that clinical PET imaging is a useful tool for early response monitoring in clinical studies.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin D1Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmunohistochemistryMiceMice, NudePhosphorylationPositron-Emission TomographyProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metStomach NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsCcnd1 protein, mouseCyclin D1Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID22864665
OpenAlexW2026027163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.