ReviewDer Orthopade2012
[Vertebral stability in management of spinal metastases. Criteria and strategies for operative interventions].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is there a relationship between spinal instability in neoplastic disease and Tokuhashi scoring system?Neurosurgical review · 2016Article
- [Kyphoplasty combined with intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT). Alternative therapy for patients with oligometastatic spinal metastases].Der Radiologe · 2015Article
- Factors Affecting Survival in Patients Undergoing Palliative Spine Surgery for Metastatic Lung and Hepatocellular Cancer: Dose the Type of Surgery Influence the Surgical Results for Metastatic Spine Disease?Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2015Article
- [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].Der Orthopade · 2013Review
- [Tumors and metastases of the upper cervical spine (C0-2). A special challenge].Der Orthopade · 2013Review
- [Results-adapted operative treatment options for spinal metastases].Der Orthopade · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastases are responsible for most tumor manifestations of the spine. About 25% are symptomatic; however, due to interdisciplinary management the tumor-associated mortality is regressing. Associated acute spinal cord injury (SCI) syndromes raise patient morbidity with a loss of independence and quality of life associated with a fair potential for recovery. Therefore, the management is focused on the avoidance of SCI. The assessment of mechanical stability of vertebral bodies is a central part of decision-making when considering operative therapy. This review gives an update on the current evidence-based data for metastasis management. DECISION MAKING: The NOMS concept is well established. Especially the parameters origin, neurologic symptoms, stability and vascularization are described and illustrated by clinical cases. OPERATIVE THERAPY CONCEPTS: Evidence-based operative therapy concepts are shown reflecting palliative and curative approaches. ASSESSMENT OF PARAMETERS FOR THERAPY ALGORITHM: Clinical and radiological parameters help to find the individual therapy. Generally a number of scores with significant time expenditure are needed. The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) simplifies the management. Operative therapy shows the best results for the parameters pain and quality of life. However, potential perioperative and postoperative complications have to be estimated and should be avoided. Using these facts our therapy algorithm is helpful for therapy management.
conclusionsWith rising life expectancy operative therapy is of increasing relevance. Decision-making uses information about tumor origin, neurologic symptoms, stability, prognostic factors and vascularisation to determine the individual therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22864656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.