Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864656›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2012

[Vertebral stability in management of spinal metastases. Criteria and strategies for operative interventions].

B Wiedenhöfer, M Möhlenbruch, S Hemmer, B Lehner, K Klöckner, M Akbar

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B WiedenhöferDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Sektion Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. bernd.wiedenhoefer@med.uni-heidelberg.de
M Möhlenbruch
S Hemmer
B Lehner
K Klöckner
M Akbar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastases are responsible for most tumor manifestations of the spine. About 25% are symptomatic; however, due to interdisciplinary management the tumor-associated mortality is regressing. Associated acute spinal cord injury (SCI) syndromes raise patient morbidity with a loss of independence and quality of life associated with a fair potential for recovery. Therefore, the management is focused on the avoidance of SCI. The assessment of mechanical stability of vertebral bodies is a central part of decision-making when considering operative therapy. This review gives an update on the current evidence-based data for metastasis management. DECISION MAKING: The NOMS concept is well established. Especially the parameters origin, neurologic symptoms, stability and vascularization are described and illustrated by clinical cases. OPERATIVE THERAPY CONCEPTS: Evidence-based operative therapy concepts are shown reflecting palliative and curative approaches. ASSESSMENT OF PARAMETERS FOR THERAPY ALGORITHM: Clinical and radiological parameters help to find the individual therapy. Generally a number of scores with significant time expenditure are needed. The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) simplifies the management. Operative therapy shows the best results for the parameters pain and quality of life. However, potential perioperative and postoperative complications have to be estimated and should be avoided. Using these facts our therapy algorithm is helpful for therapy management.

conclusionsWith rising life expectancy operative therapy is of increasing relevance. Decision-making uses information about tumor origin, neurologic symptoms, stability, prognostic factors and vascularisation to determine the individual therapy.

Indexed as

HumansJoint InstabilitySpinal FusionSpinal Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.