ArticleJournal of oleo science2012
A 9 GHz EPR imager for thin materials: application to surface detection.
Article in Journal of oleo science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Distribution of Stable Paramagnetic Species in an Apple Seed Using X-Band EPR and EPR Imaging.Journal of oleo science · 2017Article
- Locations of radical species in black pepper seeds investigated by CW EPR and 9GHz EPR imaging.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A 9 GHz EPR imager that is capable of the imaging surface area of thin materials has been built. The EPR imager resolved samples spaced 1 mm apart. The developed TE(111) cavity was able to detect easily ~1.0 mM aqueous TEMPOL solution in ~1.0 mm (i.d.) glass capillary placed just above the cavity. The sensitivity measured using the TEMPOL solution showed ~0.3 of that for the modified JEOL cavity, which was in a qualitative agreement with the calculations considering the difference in the filling factors of the cavities. The relatively low measured sensitivity of the TE(111) cavity is due to utilization of the microwave field from ~3 mm aperture (hole) in the cavity wall. More importantly, the TE(111) cavity does not require inserting the sample into the cavity and placing samples into EPR tubes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.