Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864479›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2012

Destabilizing giant vesicles with electric fields: an overview of current applications.

Thomas Portet, Chloé Mauroy, Vincent Démery, Thibault Houles, Jean-Michel Escoffre, David S Dean, Marie-Pierre Rols

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bilayer Charge Asymmetry and Oil Residues Destabilize Membranes upon Poration.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Added-Value Surfactants.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.Advances in genetics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas PortetLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS UMR 5152, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Chloé Mauroy
Vincent Démery
Thibault Houles
Jean-Michel Escoffre
David S Dean
Marie-Pierre Rols

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents an overview of the effects of electric fields on giant unilamellar vesicles. The application of electrical fields leads to three basic phenomena: shape changes, membrane breakdown, and uptake of molecules. We describe how some of these observations can be used to measure a variety of physical properties of lipid membranes or to advance our understanding of the phenomena of electropermeabilization. We also present results on how electropermeabilization and other liposome responses to applied fields are affected by lipid composition and by the presence of molecules of therapeutic interest in the surrounding solution.

Indexed as

ElectroporationMembrane FusionMolecular ConformationPermeabilityPliabilityThermodynamicsUnilamellar LiposomesUnilamellar Liposomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.