Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22864413›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2012

Chronological histological changes during bone regeneration on a non-crosslinked atelocollagen matrix.

Ryosuke Kagawa, Mitsunobu Kishino, Sunao Sato, Ken Ishida, Yuzo Ogawa, Kazunori Ikebe, Kaori Oya, Takuya Ishimoto, Takayoshi Nakano, Yoshinobu Maeda and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryosuke KagawaDepartment of Oral Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsunobu Kishino
Sunao Sato
Ken Ishida
Yuzo Ogawa
Kazunori Ikebe
Kaori Oya
Takuya Ishimoto
Takayoshi Nakano
Yoshinobu Maeda
Toshihisa Komori
Satoru Toyosawa
Osaka University · JPNagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleavage of the antigenic telopeptide region from type I collagen yields atelocollagen, and this is widely used as a scaffold for bone regeneration combined with cells, growth factors, etc. However, neither the biological effect of atelocollagen alone or its contribution to bone regeneration has been well studied. We evaluated the chronological histological changes during bone regeneration following implantation of non-crosslinked atelocollagen (Koken Co., Ltd.) in rat calvarial defects. One week after implantation, osteogenic cells positive for runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and osteoclasts positive for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) were present in the atelocollagen implant in the absence of bone formation. The number of Runx2-positive osteogenic cells and Osterix-positive osteoblasts increased 2 weeks after implantation, and bone matrix proteins (osteopontin, OPN; osteocalcin, OC; dentin matrix protein 1, DMP1) were distributed in newly formed bone in a way comparable to normal bone. Some resorption cavities containing osteoclasts were also present. By 3 weeks after implantation, most of the implanted atelocollagen was replaced by new bone containing many resorption cavities, and OPN, OC, and DMP1 were deposited in the residual collagenous matrix. After 4 weeks, nearly all of the atelocollagen implant was replaced with new bone including hematopoietic marrow. Immunohistochemistry for the telopeptide region of type I collagen (TeloCOL1) during these processes demonstrated that the TeloCOL1-negative atelocollagen implant was replaced by TeloCOL1-positive collagenous matrix and new bone, indicating that new bone was mostly composed of endogenous type I collagen. These findings suggest that the atelocollagen itself can support bone regeneration by promoting osteoblast differentiation and type I collagen production.

Indexed as

Acid PhosphataseAnimalsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCollagenCollagen Type IIsoenzymesMaleOsteogenesisRatsRats, WistarSkullTartrate-Resistant Acid PhosphataseAcid PhosphataseatelocollagenBone SubstitutesCollagenCollagen Type IIsoenzymesTartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase

Identifiers

PMID22864413
OpenAlexW1969981585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.