Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22863740›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration

Controlling matrix stiffness and topography for the study of tumor cell migration.

Casey M Kraning-Rush, Cynthia A Reinhart-King

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Insights intoMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Casey M Kraning-RushDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Cynthia A Reinhart-King

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143876 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2014
$12.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143876NCI NIH HHS U54CA143876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular studies have long been performed on the bench top, within Petri dishes and flasks that expose cells to surroundings that differ greatly from their native environment. The complexity of a human tissue is such that to truly replicate a cell's physiologic microenvironment in vitro is currently impossible. It is nevertheless important to determine how various factors of the microenvironment interact to drive cell behavior, particularly with regard to disease states, such as cancer. Here we focus on two key elements of the cellular microenvironment, matrix stiffness and architecture, in the context of tumor cell behavior. We discuss recent work focusing on the effects of these individual properties on cancer cell migration and describe one technique developed by our lab that could be applied to dissect the effects of specific structural and mechanical cues, and which may lead to useful insights into the potentially synergistic effects of these properties on tumor cell behavior.

Indexed as

Cell MovementTumor MicroenvironmentAcrylic ResinsAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCulture MediaExtracellular MatrixHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsTumor Cells, CulturedAcrylic ResinsCulture Mediapolyacrylamide gels

Identifiers

PMID22863740
PMCPMC3427241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.