Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22863408›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2012

Analysis of CLIP and iCLIP methods for nucleotide-resolution studies of protein-RNA interactions.

Yoichiro Sugimoto, Julian König, Shobbir Hussain, Blaž Zupan, Tomaž Curk, Michaela Frye, Jernej Ule

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Influenza NS1 drives NEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  13. Gene regulation through exon junction complex modularity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of crosslinking sites suggestsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoichiro Sugimoto
Julian König
Shobbir Hussain
Blaž Zupan
Tomaž Curk
Michaela Frye
Jernej Ule

Funding

European Research Council 206726Medical Research Council G0800784Medical Research Council G0801904Medical Research Council MC_U105185858Medical Research Council U105185858Wellcome Trust 089701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) and individual-nucleotide resolution CLIP (iCLIP) are methods to study protein-RNA interactions in untreated cells and tissues. Here, we analyzed six published and two novel data sets to confirm that both methods identify protein-RNA cross-link sites, and to identify a slight uridine preference of UV-C-induced cross-linking. Comparing Nova CLIP and iCLIP data revealed that cDNA deletions have a preference for TTT motifs, whereas iCLIP cDNA truncations are more likely to identify clusters of YCAY motifs as the primary Nova binding sites. In conclusion, we demonstrate how each method impacts the analysis of protein-RNA binding specificity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsGene LibraryHeLa CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoprecipitationMethyltransferasesMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuro-Oncological Ventral AntigenRNARNA-Binding ProteinsAntigens, NeoplasmMethyltransferasesNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuro-Oncological Ventral AntigenNSUN2 protein, humanRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22863408
PMCPMC4053741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.