Trial reportBMC pediatrics2012
A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04962828 (The Effect Of An Inter Disciplinary Approach On Vocabulary Development in Children With Hearing Impairment; A Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect Of An Inter Disciplinary Approach On Vocabulary Development in Children With Hearing Impairment; A Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motor Learning Feeding Interventions for Infants at Risk of Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Dose frequency randomized controlled trial for Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) treatment for childhood apraxia of speech: protocol paper.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2019Review
- Selected rare paediatric communication neurological disorders.Journal of applied biomedicine · 2019Review
- Using ultrasound visual feedback to remediate velar fronting in preschool children: A pilot study.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2016Article
- Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2014Article
- Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).Current developmental disorders reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice. METHODS/
designA parallel group, fixed size randomised control trial will be conducted in Sydney, Australia to determine the efficacy of two treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 1) Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the 2) Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme - Third edition. Eligible children will be English speaking, aged 4-12 years with a diagnosis of suspected CAS, normal or adjusted hearing and vision, and no comprehension difficulties or other developmental diagnoses. At least 20 children will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments in parallel. Treatments will be delivered by trained and supervised speech pathology clinicians using operationalised manuals. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions, 4 times per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes are speech sound and prosodic accuracy on a customised 292 item probe and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology inconsistency subtest administered prior to treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months post-treatment. All post assessments will be completed by blinded assessors. Our hypotheses are: 1) treatment effects at 1 week post will be similar for both treatments, 2) maintenance of treatment effects at 1 and 4 months post will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment, and 3) generalisation of treatment effects to untrained related speech behaviours will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment. This protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (#12924). DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomised control trial to test treatment for CAS. It will be valuable for clinical decision-making and providing evidence-based services for children with CAS.
trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000744853.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.