Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22860889›Full record

ArticleNutrition and cancer2012

Fruit, vegetable, and animal food intake and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor status.

Ping-Ping Bao, Xiao-Ou Shu, Ying Zheng, Hui Cai, Zhi-Xian Ruan, Kai Gu, Yinghao Su, Yu-Tang Gao, Wei Zheng, Wei Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition and cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cancer incidence and mortality during the intervention and postintervention periods of the Women's Health Initiative dietary modification trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Diet and Breast Cancer Risk.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping-Ping BaoShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Ou Shu
Ying Zheng
Hui Cai
Zhi-Xian Ruan
Kai Gu
Yinghao Su
Yu-Tang Gao
Wei Zheng
Wei Lu
Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNVanderbilt University Medical Center · USShanghai Cancer Institute · CN

Funding

Shanghai Breast Cancer StudyR01CA064277 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 1996 to 2012
$4.8M
Vanderbilt-Shanghai Chronic Disease Research Training ProgramD43TW008313 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008313FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008313-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA064277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of diet on breast cancer are controversial and whether the effects vary with hormone receptor status has not been well investigated. This study evaluated the associations of dietary factors with risk for breast cancer overall and by the hormone receptor status of tumors among Chinese women. The Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a large, population-based, case-control study, enrolled 3,443 cases and 3,474 controls in 1996-1998 (phase I) and 2002-2005 (phase II); 2676 cases had estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) data. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated, quantitative, food frequency questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were derived from multivariate, polychotomous, unconditional logistic regression models. Total vegetable intake was inversely related to breast cancer risk, with an adjusted OR for the highest quintile of 0.80 (95% CI = 0.67-0.95; P trend = 0.02). Reduced risk was also related to high intake of allium vegetables (P trend = 0.01) and fresh legumes (P trend = 0.0008). High intake of citrus fruits and rosaceae fruits were inversely associated with breast cancer risk (P trend = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively), although no consistent association was seen for total fruit intake. Elevated risk was observed for all types of meat and fish intake (all P trend < 0.05), whereas intakes of eggs and milk were associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer (both P trend <0.05). There was little evidence that associations with dietary intakes varied across the 4 tumor subtypes or between ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- tumors (P for heterogeneity >0.05). Our results suggest that high intake of total vegetables, certain fruits, milk, and eggs may reduce the risk of breast cancer, whereas high consumption of animal-source foods may increase risk. The dietary associations did not appear to vary by ER/PR status.

Indexed as

DietFruitVegetablesAdultAgedAlliumAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChinaEatingEggsFemaleFish ProductsHumansLogistic ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID22860889
PMCPMC3758811
OpenAlexW2080277111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.