ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2012
Structurally diverse GABA antagonists interact differently with open and closed conformational states of the ρ1 receptor.
Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antagonistic effect of dopamine structural analogues on human GABAρ1 receptor.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- GABA-ρ receptors: distinctive functions and molecular pharmacology.British journal of pharmacology · 2017Review
- A molecular characterization of the agonist binding site of a nematode cys-loop GABA receptor.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Article
- Quantum dot conjugates of GABA and muscimol: binding to α1β2γ2 and ρ1 GABA(A) receptors.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ligands acting on receptors are considered to induce a conformational change within the ligand-binding site by interacting with specific amino acids. In this study, tyrosine 102 (Y102) located in the GABA binding site of the ρ(1) subunit of the GABA(C) receptor was mutated to alanine (ρ(1Y102A)), serine (ρ(1Y102S)), and cysteine (ρ(1Y102C)) to assess the role of this amino acid in the action of 12 known and 2 novel antagonists. Of the mutated receptors, ρ(1Y102S) was constitutively active, providing an opportunity to assess the activity of antagonists on ρ(1) receptors with a proportion of receptors existing in the open conformational state compared to those existing predominantly in the closed conformational state. It was found that the majority of antagonists studied were able to inhibit the constitutive activity displayed by ρ(1Y102S), thus displaying inverse agonist activity. The exception was (±)-4-aminocyclopent-1-enecarboxamide ((±)-4-ACPAM) (8) not exhibiting any inverse agonist activity, but acting explicitly on the closed conformational state of ρ(1) receptors (ρ(1) wild-type, ρ(1Y102C) and ρ(1Y102A)). It was also found that the GABA antagonists were more potent at the closed compared to the open conformational states of ρ(1) receptors, suggesting that they may act by stabilizing closed conformational state and thus reducing activation by agonists. Furthermore, of the antagonists tested, Y102 was found to have the greatest influence on the antagonist activity of gabazine (SR-95531 (13)) and its analogue (SR-95813 (14)). This study contributes to our understanding of the mechanism of inverse agonism. This is important, as such agents are emerging as potential therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.