SynthesisPloS one2012
Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Relationship of Continuity of Care, Polypharmacy and Medication Appropriateness: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Drugs & aging · 2023Pooled it
- [Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].Atencion primaria · 2020Pooled it
- The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017Pooled it
- Instruments Measuring Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.The Milbank quarterly · 2016Pooled it
- Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2016Pooled it
- Measurement properties of multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures in neurodisability: a systematic review of evaluation studies.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2016Pooled it
- The measurement properties of the IKDC-subjective knee form.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015Pooled it
- Evaluation of a new person-centered integrated care model in psychiatry.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2015Trial
- Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Does improved continuity of primary care affect clinician-patient communication in VA?Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Trial
- Moving forward, leaving the patients behind? A multilevel assessment framework for evaluating patient-centred, integrated care quality.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Patient perceptions of relational continuity in England: insights from two cross-sectional surveys.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with elbow-related orthopedic conditions.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Continuity of primary care for type 2 diabetes and hypertension and its association with health outcomes and disease control: insights from Central Vietnam.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Transition is associated with lower disease activity, fewer relapses, better medication adherence, and lower lost-to-follow-up rate as opposed to self-transfer in pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease patients: results of a longitudinal, follow-up, controlled study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Which methods are most practicable for measuring continuity within general practices?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Association of Continuity of General Practitioner Care with Utilisation of General Practitioner and Specialist Services in China: A Mixed-Method Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS.Psychometrika · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care is widely acknowledged as a core value in family medicine. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the instruments measuring continuity of care and to assess the quality of their measurement properties.
methodsWe did a systematic review using the PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, with an extensive search strategy including 'continuity of care', 'coordination of care', 'integration of care', 'patient centered care', 'case management' and its linguistic variations. We searched from 1995 to October 2011 and included articles describing the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of instruments measuring one or more dimensions of continuity of care (1) care from the same provider who knows and follows the patient (personal continuity), (2) communication and cooperation between care providers in one care setting (team continuity), and (3) communication and cooperation between care providers in different care settings (cross-boundary continuity). We assessed the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using the COSMIN checklist.
resultsWe included 24 articles describing the development and/or evaluation of 21 instruments. Ten instruments measured all three dimensions of continuity of care. Instruments were developed for different groups of patients or providers. For most instruments, three or four of the six measurement properties were assessed (mostly internal consistency, content validity, structural validity and construct validity). Six instruments scored positive on the quality of at least three of six measurement properties.
conclusionsMost included instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties or the ability to measure all three dimensions of continuity of care. Based on the results of this review, we recommend the use of one of the four most promising instruments, depending on the target population Diabetes Continuity of Care Questionnaire, Alberta Continuity of Services Scale-Mental Health, Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.