Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22860021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Evaluation of dynamic [18F]-FDG-PET imaging for the detection of acute post-surgical bone infection.

Tracy L Y Brown, Horace J Spencer, Karen E Beenken, Terri L Alpe, Twyla B Bartel, William Bellamy, J Michael Gruenwald, Robert A Skinner, Sandra G McLaren, Mark S Smeltzer

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. State of the art ofClinical and translational imaging · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Charcot foot and ankle with osteomyelitis.Diabetic foot & ankle · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy L Y BrownDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.
Horace J Spencer
Karen E Beenken
Terri L Alpe
Twyla B Bartel
William Bellamy
J Michael Gruenwald
Robert A Skinner
Sandra G McLaren
Mark S Smeltzer
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Detection, diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal infectionR01AI069087 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SMELTZER, MARK S · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS RR0298884NIAID NIH HHS AI069087NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing bone infection in its acute early stage is of utmost clinical importance as the failure to do so results in a therapeutically recalcitrant chronic infection that can only be resolved with extensive surgical intervention, the end result often being a structurally unstable defect requiring reconstructive procedures. [(18)F]-FDG-PET has been extensively investigated for this purpose, but the results have been mixed in that, while highly sensitive, its specificity with respect to distinguishing between acute infection and sterile inflammatory processes, including normal recuperative post-surgical healing, is limited. This study investigated the possibility that alternative means of acquiring and analyzing FDG-PET data could be used to overcome this lack of specificity without an unacceptable loss of sensitivity. This was done in the context of an experimental rabbit model of post-surgical osteomyelitis with the objective of distinguishing between acute infection and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Imaging was done 7 and 14 days after surgery with continuous data acquisition for a 90-minute period after administration of tracer. Results were evaluated based on both single and dual time point data analysis. The results suggest that the diagnostic utility of FDG-PET is likely limited to well-defined clinical circumstances. We conclude that, in the complicated clinical context of acute post-surgical or post-traumatic infection, the diagnostic utility accuracy of FDG-PET is severely limited based on its focus on the increased glucose utilization that is generally characteristic of inflammatory processes.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAnimalsMaleOsteomyelitisPositron-Emission TomographyRabbitsRadiusStaphylococcal InfectionsSurgical Wound InfectionFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID22860021
PMCPMC3408436
OpenAlexW1977795118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.