Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22859946›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Biomarkers of good EULAR response to the B cell depletion therapy in all seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: clues for the pathogenesis.

Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Barbara Tolusso, Francesca Bobbio-Pallavicini, Elisa Gremese, Viviana Ravagnani, Maurizio Benucci, Edoardo Podestà, Fabiola Atzeni, Alice Mannocci, Domenico Biasi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Towards Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Autoantibody-mediated bone loss.Current osteoporosis reports · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gianfranco FerraccioliDivision of Rheumatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. gf.ferraccioli@rm.unicatt.it
Barbara Tolusso
Francesca Bobbio-Pallavicini
Elisa Gremese
Viviana Ravagnani
Maurizio Benucci
Edoardo Podestà
Fabiola Atzeni
Alice Mannocci
Domenico Biasi
Mariangela Manfredi
Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini
Bruno Laganà
Carlomaurizio Montecucco
Sapienza University of Rome · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Verona · ITUniversity of the Sacred Heart · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo find out whether a high number of auto-antibodies can increase the probability of a "good-EULAR response" and to identify the possible biomarkers of response in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing the B cell depletion therapy (BCDT). PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred and thirty-eight patients with long standing RA (LSRA), 75% non or poorly responsive to one or more TNFα blockers, all seropositive for at least one autoantibody (AAB) (RF-IgM, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, anti-MCV, ACPA-IgG, ACPA-IgA, ACPA-IgM) received one full course of BCDT. The major outcomes (moderate or good-EULAR response) were assessed after 6 months of therapy. The IL6 and BAFF levels were also determined.

resultsAt a 6-month follow-up, 33 (23.9%) of the RA patients achieved a good EULAR response. Having up to 5-AABs positivity increased the chances for treatment response. After a logistic regression analysis, however, only 4 baseline factors arose as associated with a good-EULAR response: no steroid therapy (OR = 6.25), a lymphocyte count <1875/uL (OR = 10.74), a RF-IgG level >52.1 IU/ml (OR = 8.37) and BAFF levels <1011 pg/ml (OR = 7.38). When all the AABs, except for RF-IgM and ACPA-IgG, were left in the analysis, the two final predictors were no-steroid therapy and low lymphocyte count. DISCUSSION: The number of AABs increased the chances of being a "good-EULAR" responder. The only predictors, however, at the baseline of a good response in this seropositive cohort of RA patients were 2 simple variables--no steroids and lymphocyte count--and two laboratory assays--IgG-RF and BAFF.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte DepletionAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsArea Under CurveArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesB-Cell Activating FactorBiomarkersB-LymphocytesFemaleHumansInterleukin-6Logistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsAutoantibodiesB-Cell Activating FactorBiomarkersIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6RituximabTNFSF13B protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22859946
PMCPMC3408482
OpenAlexW1983146082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.