SynthesisPLoS medicine2012
Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06196918 (Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Glioma Patients With Postoperative Lower Extremity Dyskinesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 268 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Glioma Patients With Postoperative Lower Extremity Dyskinesia
Who cites it
268 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 556 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stroke risk in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis and meta regression.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Incidence of thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for the prevention of arterial thromboembolism in cancer patients by primary tumour site: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Burden and distribution of venous thromboembolism across cancer types and stages: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Clinical factors of PICC-RVT in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment Algorithm in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Updated Canadian Expert Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- DOAC compared to LMWH in the treatment of cancer related-venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Alcohol Consumption and Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Treatment algorithm in cancer-associated thrombosis: Canadian expert consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Pooled it
- Tinzaparin for Long-Term Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Optic nerve sheath fenestration in leukemic patients having increased intracranial pressure: a prospective clinical trial.International ophthalmology · 2021Trial
- Khorana Score: Νew Predictor of Early Mortality in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018Trial
- Review
- Coagulation disorders and thromboprophylaxis in pancreatic cancer: a review of current evidence and clinical challenges.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Bleeding and Death in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Article
208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with cancer are known to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this risk is believed to vary according to cancer type, stage of disease, and treatment modality. Our purpose was to summarise the existing literature to determine precisely and accurately the absolute risk of VTE in cancer patients, stratified by malignancy site and background risk of VTE. METHODS AND
findingsWe searched the Medline and Embase databases from 1 January 1966 to 14 July 2011 to identify cohort studies comprising people diagnosed with one of eight specified cancer types or where participants were judged to be representative of all people with cancer. For each included study, the number of patients who developed clinically apparent VTE, and the total person-years of follow-up were extracted. Incidence rates of VTE were pooled across studies using the generic inverse variance method. In total, data from 38 individual studies were included. Among average-risk patients, the overall risk of VTE was estimated to be 13 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 7 to 23), with the highest risk among patients with cancers of the pancreas, brain, and lung. Among patients judged to be at high risk (due to metastatic disease or receipt of high-risk treatments), the risk of VTE was 68 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 48 to 96), with the highest risk among patients with brain cancer (200 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI, 162 to 247). Our results need to be considered in light of high levels of heterogeneity, which exist due to differences in study population, outcome definition, and average duration of follow-up between studies.
conclusionsVTE occurs in greater than 1% of cancer patients each year, but this varies widely by cancer type and time since diagnosis. The absolute VTE risks obtained from this review can aid in clinical decision-making about which people with cancer should receive anticoagulant prophylaxis and at what times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.