Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22859524›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2012

End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: can we simultaneously increase quality and reduce costs?

J Randall Curtis, Ruth A Engelberg, Mark E Bensink, Scott D Ramsey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02445937 (Stepped Wedge Trial of an Intervention to Support Proxy Decision Makers in ICUs), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02445937 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Stepped Wedge Trial of an Intervention to Support Proxy Decision Makers in ICUs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2015 to 2019Enrolled848ConditionsAnxiety, DepressionArmsPARTNER II
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. End-of-Life Decision Support in the ICU: Where Are We Now?Western journal of nursing research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Randall CurtisDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. jrc@u.washington.edu
Ruth A Engelberg
Mark E Bensink
Scott D Ramsey

Funding

Randomized trial of an interdisciplinary communication intervention to improve paR01NR005226 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURTIS, J RANDALL, ENGELBERG, RUTH ANN · 1999 to 2012
$6.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR005226NINR NIH HHS R01NR05226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence and costs of critical illness are increasing in the United States at a time when there is a focus both on limiting the rising costs of healthcare and improving the quality of end-of-life care. More than 25% of healthcare costs are spent in the last year of life, and approximately 20% of deaths occur in the intensive care unit (ICU). Consequently, there has been speculation that end-of-life care in the ICU represents an important target for cost savings. It is unclear whether efforts to improve end-of-life care in the ICU could significantly reduce healthcare costs. Here, we summarize recent studies suggesting that important opportunities may exist to improve quality and reduce costs through two mechanisms: advance care planning for patients with life-limiting illness and use of time-limited trials of ICU care for critically ill patients. The goal of these approaches is to ensure patients receive the intensity of care that they would choose at the end of life, given the opportunity to make an informed decision. Although these mechanisms hold promise for increasing quality and reducing costs, there are few clearly described, effective methods to implement these mechanisms in routine clinical practice. We believe basic science in communication and decision making, implementation research, and demonstration projects are critically important if we are to translate these approaches into practice and, in so doing, provide high-quality and patient-centered care while limiting rising healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost SavingsCritical CareHumansPalliative CareQuality of Health CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID22859524
PMCPMC3480521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.