Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22858794›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2012

Patient-clinician information engagement improves adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after curative treatment: results from a longitudinal study.

Andy S L Tan, Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson, Sarah Parvanta, Stacy W Gray, Katrina Armstrong, Robert C Hornik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adherence to therapy for Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia.United European gastroenterology journal · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Formative Study of Colon Cancer Surveillance Care: Implications for Survivor-Centered Interventions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations between cancer-related information seeking and receiving PET imaging for routine cancer surveillance--an analysis of longitudinal survey data.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andy S L TanCenter of Excellence in Cancer Communication Research, Annenberg School for Communication,University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA19104, USA. atan@asc.upenn.edu
Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson
Sarah Parvanta
Stacy W Gray
Katrina Armstrong
Robert C Hornik

Funding

Effects of Public Information in Cancer (EPIC Center)P50CA095856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C. · 2003 to 2007
$10.1M
Training / Career DevelopmentP20CA095856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C. · 2008 to 2012
$8.7M
NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA095856-05NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA095856-06NCI NIH HHS P20 CA095856NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Follow-up surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is recommended to detect early cancer recurrences and improve survival outcomes. However, a substantial proportion of CRC patients do not undergo cancer surveillance. Several demographic and disease-related factors have been associated with cancer surveillance adherence. Thus far, patient-centered communication has not been studied as a determinant for undergoing cancer surveillance. The purpose of this study is to determine whether patient-clinician information engagement (PCIE) influences patients' self-reported adherence to recommended CRC surveillance procedures. Methods. The study was a longitudinal survey among Pennsylvanian patients diagnosed with CRC in 2005. CRC patients who were eligible for surveillance and participated in both the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys were included in this analysis (n = 305). The main outcome measure was self-reported adherence to physical examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, and colonoscopy according to recommended guidelines. Results. Controlling for potential confounders, higher PCIE at baseline predicted a higher odds for CRC patients reporting adherence to recommended surveillance 1 year later by 2.8 times. Other significant predictors of adhering to recommended surveillance were a higher education level and having received systemic therapy. Discussion. In this longitudinal study among CRC patients who received curative treatment, greater patient engagement with clinicians about cancer-related information was found to improve patients' subsequent adherence to recommended surveillance. This finding provides support for encouraging greater patient-physician communication among CRC patients.

Indexed as

Patient CompliancePhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoembryonic AntigenColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPennsylvaniaCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID22858794
PMCPMC3448408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.