Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22858614›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of audiology2012

An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.

Ryan W McCreery, Rebecca A Venediktov, Jaumeiko J Coleman, Hillary M Leech

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of audiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hearing Aid apps: are they safe, practical and beneficial for children and teens in challenging situations?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temperament in Toddlers With and Without Prelingual Hearing Loss.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonsurgical Management of Single-Sided Deafness: Contralateral Routing of Signal.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pattern of Use of Earphone and Music Player Devices among Iranian Adolescents.International journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan W McCreeryBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA. Ryan.McCreery@boystown.org
Rebecca A Venediktov
Jaumeiko J Coleman
Hillary M Leech

Funding

Outcomes of School-Age Children who are Hard of HearingR01DC009560 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MOELLER, MARY PAT, TOMBLIN, JAMES BRUCE · 2008 to 2017
$13.8M
OPTIMIZING SPEECH RECOGNITION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSSR03DC012635 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI MCCREERY, RYAN W. · 2012 to 2014
$431k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009560NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC012635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this evidence-based systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of digital noise reduction and directional microphones for outcome measures of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report in pediatric hearing aid users.

methodThe authors searched 26 databases for experimental studies published after 1980 addressing one or more clinical questions and meeting all inclusion criteria. The authors evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated p values and effect sizes when possible.

resultsA systematic search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 4 digital noise reduction and 7 directional microphone studies (in 9 journal articles) that addressed speech recognition, speech and language, and/or self- or parent-report outcomes. No digital noise reduction or directional microphone studies addressed audibility outcomes.

conclusionsOn the basis of a moderate level of evidence, digital noise reduction was not found to improve or degrade speech understanding. Additional research is needed before conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of digital noise reduction on important speech, language, hearing, and satisfaction outcomes. Moderate evidence also indicates that directional microphones resulted in improved speech recognition in controlled optimal settings; however, additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of directional microphones in actual everyday listening environments.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEquipment DesignHearing LossHumansNoiseTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22858614
PMCPMC3723379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.