Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22857382›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2012

Development of an efficient, non-viral transfection method for studying gene function and bone growth in human primary cranial suture mesenchymal cells reveals that the cells respond to BMP2 and BMP3.

Prem P Dwivedi, Peter J Anderson, Barry C Powell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Knock-In Approach to Insert the GFPMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Ex Vivo Culture of Human Cranial Suture Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The shape of the human language-ready brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prem P DwivediCraniofacial Research Group, Women's and Children's Health Research Institute, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia.
Peter J Anderson
Barry C Powell
University of Adelaide · AUWomen's & Children's Health Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving efficient introduction of plasmid DNA into primary cultures of mammalian cells is a common problem in biomedical research. Human primary cranial suture cells are derived from the connective mesenchymal tissue between the bone forming regions at the edges of the calvarial plates of the skull. Typically they are referred to as suture mesenchymal cells and are a heterogeneous population responsible for driving the rapid skull growth that occurs in utero and postnatally. To better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in skull growth, and in abnormal growth conditions, such as craniosynostosis, caused by premature bony fusion, it is essential to be able to easily introduce genes into primary bone forming cells to study their function.

resultsA comparison of several lipid-based techniques with two electroporation-based techniques demonstrated that the electroporation method known as nucleofection produced the best transfection efficiency. The parameters of nucleofection, including cell number, amount of DNA and nucleofection program, were optimized for transfection efficiency and cell survival. Two different genes and two promoter reporter vectors were used to validate the nucleofection method and the responses of human primary suture mesenchymal cells by fluorescence microscopy, RT-PCR and the dual luciferase assay. Quantification of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling using luciferase reporters demonstrated robust responses of the cells to both osteogenic BMP2 and to the anti-osteogenic BMP3.

conclusionsA nucleofection protocol has been developed that provides a simple and efficient, non-viral alternative method for in vitro studies of gene and protein function in human skull growth. Human primary suture mesenchymal cells exhibit robust responses to BMP2 and BMP3, and thus nucleofection can be a valuable method for studying the potential competing action of these two bone growth factors in a model system of cranial bone growth.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 3Cells, CulturedCell SurvivalCranial SuturesGenes, ReporterGlypicansGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLiposomesMesenchymal Stem CellsMicePlasmidsTransfectionBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 3GlypicansGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID22857382
PMCPMC3431223
OpenAlexW2096722301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.