Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22855799›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Taste coding in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the awake, freely licking rat.

Andre T Roussin, Alexandra E D'Agostino, Andrew M Fooden, Jonathan D Victor, Patricia M Di Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Active Licking Shapes Cortical Taste Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Enhancing GABAergic Tone in the Rostral Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Reconfigures Sensorimotor Neural Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Layer- and Cell Type-Specific Response Properties of Gustatory Cortex Neurons in Awake Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Optogenetic Stimulation of Type I GAD65The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Taste coding strategies in insular cortex.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andre T RoussinDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902, USA.
Alexandra E D'Agostino
Andrew M Fooden
Jonathan D Victor
Patricia M Di Lorenzo

Funding

Temporal Coding in the Gustatory System of the BrainR01DC006914 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI DI LORENZO, PATRICIA M · 2006 to 2020
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly clear that the brain processes sensory stimuli differently according to whether they are passively or actively acquired, and these differences can be seen early in the sensory pathway. In the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), the first relay in the central gustatory neuraxis, a rich variety of sensory inputs generated by active licking converge. Here, we show that taste responses in the NTS reflect these interactions. Experiments consisted of recordings of taste-related activity in the NTS of awake rats as they freely licked exemplars of the five basic taste qualities (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami). Nearly all taste-responsive cells were broadly tuned across taste qualities. A subset responded to taste with long latencies (>1.0 s), suggesting the activation of extraoral chemoreceptors. Analyses of the temporal characteristics of taste responses showed that spike timing conveyed significantly more information than spike count alone in almost one-half of NTS cells, as in anesthetized rats, but with less information per cell. In addition to taste-responsive cells, the NTS contains cells that synchronize with licks. Since the lick pattern per se can convey information, these cells may collaborate with taste-responsive cells to identify taste quality. Other cells become silent during licking. These latter "antilick" cells show a surge in firing rate predicting the beginning and signaling the end of a lick bout. Collectively, the data reveal a complex array of cell types in the NTS, only a portion of which include taste-responsive cells, which work together to acquire sensory information.

Indexed as

WakefulnessAction PotentialsAnimalsCitric AcidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinking BehaviorMaleNeural InhibitionNeuronsQuinineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement ScheduleSodium ChlorideCitric AcidQuinineSodium ChlorideSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID22855799
PMCPMC3427930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.