Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22855726›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2012

Spatio-temporal organization of replication in bacteria and eukaryotes (nucleoids and nuclei).

Dean Jackson, Xindan Wang, David Z Rudner

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How and why multiple MCMs are loaded at origins of DNA replication.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early S-phase cell hypersensitivity to heat stress.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Regulating DNA replication in plants.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dean JacksonUniversity of Manchester, Faculty of Life Sciences, Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom. dean.jackson@manchester.ac.uk
Xindan Wang
David Z Rudner

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/06091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we discuss the spatio-temporal organization of replication in eubacteria and eukaryotes. Although there are significant differences in how replication is organized in cells that contain nuclei from those that do not, you will see that organization of replication in all organisms is principally dictated by the structured arrangement of the chromosome. We will begin with how replication is organized in eubacteria with particular emphasis on three well studied model organisms. We will then discuss spatial and temporal organization of replication in eukaryotes highlighting the similarities and differences between these two domains of life.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalCell NucleusChromosomesDNA ReplicationEukaryotaNuclear MatrixTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22855726
PMCPMC3405862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.