ArticleInfection2013
Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence, genotype distribution and identification of the new Swedish variant in Southern Germany.
Article in Infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Characterization of Non-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Simultaneous detection of eleven sexually transmitted agents using multiplexed PCR coupled with MALDI-TOF analysis.Infection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Ten years transmission of the new variant ofSexually transmitted infections · 2018Article
- High prevalence of sexual Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women from Marajó Island, in the Brazilian Amazon.PloS one · 2018Article
- External Quality Assessment for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Using Molecular Techniques in Belgium.Journal of sexually transmitted diseases · 2015Article
- Novel Chlamydia trachomatis strains in heterosexual sex partners, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.Emerging infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Germany, reliable data about the prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections, causative genotypes, as well as corresponding clinical, demographic and behavioural information are sparse. We, therefore, performed a prospective prevalence study including 1,003 sexually active volunteers of a Southern German city.
methodsStudy participants completed a standardised questionnaire and provided first void urine samples for analysis. Our screening strategy included the performance of two nucleic acid amplification tests with different target genes, enabling the detection of the new Swedish variant of C. trachomatis (nvCT). Direct genotyping of positive specimens was performed by sequence analysis of the ompA gene. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe overall prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 4.2 % in women and 4.6 % in men. A relatively high prevalence of 8.3 % was found in men older than 25 years. Never using condoms was an independent risk factor for infection. The most common symptom was discharge; however, 64.5 % of infected females and all of the infected men were asymptomatic, supporting the need for screening programmes. The most frequently encountered genotypes were E (46.5 %), F (20.9 %) and K (14.0 %). Since the nvCT was detected in one female student, this is one of the rare studies that reports on the molecular identification of nvCT apart from Sweden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.