ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2012
The role of fibronectin in corneal wound healing explored by a physician-scientist.
Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenge of Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Novel Conceptual Framework, the "Triad" of Corneal Ulcer Healing/Corneal Neovascularization/Intraocular Pressure, and Avascular Tendon Healing, for Evaluation of Corneal Ulcer Therapy, Therapy of Neovascularization, Glaucoma Therapy, and Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Efficacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Smart Carriers and Nanohealers: A Nanomedical Insight on Natural Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Systems for Controlled Protein and Peptide Delivery: Future Implications for Ocular Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Wound healing profiles of hyperopic-small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Cytotoxic activity and degradation patterns of structural proteins by corneal isolates of Acanthamoeba spp.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the past 30 years, I have worked as a physician-scientist in both the clinic and laboratory setting at a number of university medical schools. Encountering patients in the clinic for whom treatment was not available led me to the laboratory in an attempt to develop the appropriate treatment for future patients. The main focus of my translational research has been the role of fibronectin in corneal epithelial wound healing and the development of fibronectin eyedrops for the treatment of patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects. An extension of this research led to the development of eyedrops containing the synthetic peptide proline-histidine-serine-arginine-asparagine (PHSRN), which corresponds to the second cell-binding site of fibronectin. My clinical experience with fibronectin eyedrops also prompted me to examine the role of the sensory neurotransmitter substance P and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in corneal wound healing, leading to the development of eyedrops containing peptides derived from these agents (peptides FGLM-amide and SSSR, respectively). Although the path from the laboratory to the clinic in these instances has been relatively short, the time required to establish the newly identified treatment modalities in the wider community has been long. In this review, I relate the trajectory of my translational research career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22855020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.