Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2012
Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 26 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact on the Hospital Stay, of an Early Oral Nutrition Protocol Applied to Gastric Cancer Patients After Total Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial (DOPGT_2015)
Effects of Walking Out From Operating Room on Postoperative Recovery of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 26 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: efficacy, safety, meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: updated Meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials (2018-2025).BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Early oral feeding after laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Rapid rehabilitation effect on complications, wound infection, anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re-admission for gastrointestinal surgery subjects: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2022Pooled it
- The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.Surgery today · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: cost-effectiveness analysis.BJS open · 2020Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- The application of enhanced recovery after surgery for upper gastrointestinal surgery: Meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Application of enhanced recovery after gastric cancer surgery: An updated meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Is ERAS effective and safe in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
methodsEighty-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned into four groups: (1) fast-track surgery (FTS) + laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy (LADG), treated with LADG and FTS treatment; (2) LADG, treated with LADG and traditional treatment; (3) FTS + open distal grastectomy (ODG), treated with ODG and FTS treatment; and (4) ODG, treated with ODG and traditional treatment. The clinical parameters and serum indicators were compared.
resultsCompared with the ODG group, the other three groups had earlier first flatus and shorter postoperative hospital stay (all P <0.01; all P <0.05), especially in the FTS + LADG group. The level of ALB was higher in the FTS + LADG group than in the LADG group at 4 and 7 days after surgery (P <0.05, P <0.01). The level of CRP in the FTS + LADG group was lower than in the FTS+ODG group at 4 and 7 days after surgery (P <0.05, P <0.05). The FTS + ODG group had lowest medical costs.
conclusionCombination of FTS and LADG in gastric cancer is safe, feasible, and efficient and can improve nutritional status, lessen postoperative stress, and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation. Compared with FTS + ODG and LADG, its advantages were limited in short-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.