ReviewLab on a chip2012
Optofluidic detection for cellular phenotyping.
Review in Lab on a chip, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated Micromirror System for High-Throughput Multi-Parametric Cell Imaging.Small methods · 2026Article
- 3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024Review
- A Critical Review on the Sensing, Control, and Manipulation of Single Molecules on Optofluidic Devices.Micromachines · 2022Review
- A Review of Optical Imaging Technologies for Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Droplet Microfluidics for Microbial Biotechnology.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022Article
- Review
- One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Low-Coherence Reflectometry for Refractive Index Measurements of Cells in Micro-Capillaries.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Microfluidic-Based Multi-Organ Platforms for Drug Discovery.Micromachines · 2016Review
- Optics-Integrated Microfluidic Platforms for Biomolecular Analyses.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
- Dynamic manipulation of particles via transformative optofluidic waveguides.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Various on-chip sensors with microfluidics for biological applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Toward giga-pixel nanoscopy on a chip: a computational wide-field look at the nano-scale without the use of lenses.Lab on a chip · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of the output of processes and molecular interactions within a single cell is highly critical to the advancement of accurate disease screening and personalized medicine. Optical detection is one of the most broadly adapted measurement methods in biological and clinical assays and serves cellular phenotyping. Recently, microfluidics has obtained increasing attention due to several advantages, such as small sample and reagent volumes, very high throughput, and accurate flow control in the spatial and temporal domains. Optofluidics, which is the attempt to integrate optics with microfluidics, shows great promise to enable on-chip phenotypic measurements with high precision, sensitivity, specificity, and simplicity. This paper reviews the most recent developments of optofluidic technologies for cellular phenotyping optical detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.