Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22854810›Full record

ReviewNature cell biology2012

Classifying collective cancer cell invasion.

Peter Friedl, Joseph Locker, Erik Sahai, Jeffrey E Segall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 530 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
530citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

530 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Changes in Tissue Fluidity Predict Tumor Aggressiveness In Vivo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine learning multiscale collective cell dynamics: From single-cell characterization to multicellular monolayer modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

470 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter FriedlDepartment of Cell Biology, NCMLS, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joseph Locker
Erik Sahai
Jeffrey E Segall

Funding

The transcriptional basis of tumor promotionR01CA104292 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LOCKER, JOSEPH D · 2003 to 2013
$3.5M
Cancer Research UK 15154NCI NIH HHS CA1000324NCI NIH HHS CA104292NCI NIH HHS CA76394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most invasive solid tumours display predominantly collective invasion, in which groups of cells invade the peritumoral stroma while maintaining cell-cell contacts. As the concepts and experimental models for functional analysis of collective cancer cell invasion are rapidly developing, we propose a framework for addressing potential mechanisms, experimental strategies and technical challenges to study this process.

Indexed as

Neoplasm InvasivenessAnimalsCarcinomaHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22854810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.